Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   do Christians want their values enforced on everyone by law?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 68 (361556)
11-04-2006 4:03 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
11-04-2006 9:04 AM


Christians Impose No Laws
Schrafinator writes:
What I'd like to understand is why she, or any other Christian, would be opposed to these Christian principles being imposed by the government but completely support the governement imposing other Christian principles, such as banning gay marriage, banning embyonic stem cell research, stopping FDA approval of certain drugs because they have a religious objection to their uses even though those uses are legal, etc?
1. The issues you cite are issues at large and not limited to Christians. For example gay marriage may be banned in some totalitarian anit-Christian nations and are banned as I understand.
2. All governments impose laws. In a democratic republic such as ours the people choose who gets into government position to impose laws. So when the electorate votes, regardless of ideology, the electorate at large decides who will impose laws. Gays likely will support their agendas and evangelicals theirs. Ultimately Christians perse impose no laws. Elected officials do that. We all work in the system to advance our ideological agendas.
3. The majority way back in Jefferson's day in fact voted for this president who had church services in the halls of congress and decided that the marine band would be nice for the music in those services. Magin that. Nowadays the majority wouldn't think of such a thing.
4. So madear, do the American thing that's been done for 200+ years. Get out, root for and vote for folks who impose laws you want imposed and who refrain from imposing others. I and my Biblicalist fellow citizens will do the same.
Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 11-04-2006 9:04 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by crashfrog, posted 11-04-2006 4:07 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 23 by LinearAq, posted 11-04-2006 5:50 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 39 by nator, posted 11-04-2006 8:18 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 68 (361561)
11-04-2006 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by arachnophilia
11-04-2006 3:47 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
Arach writes:
the unfortunate thing about democracy is that if the majority of the people want a theocracy, we have one.
LOL. When then does the alleged theocracy get the Bible back in government schools as it was for over a century before the secularists took over?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 3:47 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 4:16 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 18 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 4:21 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 40 by nator, posted 11-04-2006 8:22 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 68 (361564)
11-04-2006 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by crashfrog
11-04-2006 4:07 PM


Re: Christians Impose No Laws
Crashfrog writes:
The problem is that we have this thing called "The Constitution" and it, not the decisions of our elected officials, is the highest law of the land.
That makes it a little more tricky than mob rule, and it also gives minorities (in the numeric, population sense) more power than they would otherwise. It prevents 51% of the population from steamrolling the other 49%. It prevents a majority from enslaving a minority.
It's actually a pretty good idea, but I can see how Christianists would oppose it, or anything else that stands in the way of the unchecked power they'd love to wield over the rest of us. No surprise then that Buz would pretend like it doesn't even exist.
Why then did the authors/framers of the constitution have far more Christianity in government than is allowed by the more secularist electorate today.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by crashfrog, posted 11-04-2006 4:07 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 4:17 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 56 by crashfrog, posted 11-05-2006 2:16 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 68 (361574)
11-04-2006 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by subbie
11-04-2006 4:16 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
subbie writes:
When they either amend the Constitution or appoint enough Supreme Court Justices who are willing to ignore over 40 years of jurisprudence.
So far, no luck, thank god.
Amending the Constitution is one huge task requiring extreme majority support. The they who must do the amending happens to be a whole lot of you secularists who would need evangelization of ideology via big time revival. No worries for you the way things are going. Your side certainly has the momentum.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 4:16 PM subbie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by jar, posted 11-04-2006 6:57 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 68 (361584)
11-04-2006 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by arachnophilia
11-04-2006 4:21 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
Arach writes:
i believe my original statement answered that question: when there is a majority of people who want that.
True, but what is so unfortunate as you put it? There never was a theocracy in America, even when church was in government and never can be under the Constitution. That secularist legislators and judge appointees eventually imposed laws forbidding Christian literature, et al in public school cirriculum upon the minority proved that. That's not unfortunate for you secularists. It's unfortunate for us who's priviledges are forbidden by imposition of the majority electorate. The system is working as it should with nobody but who the majority elects ultimately doing the imposing of laws on the people at large.
That we, the minority campaign for and support implimentation of Biblical values poses no threat. If government got too religious for the wishes of the people in a democratic republic all the people need do is rally support for and get the desired change.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 4:21 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by anglagard, posted 11-04-2006 5:32 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 24 by nwr, posted 11-04-2006 5:52 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 25 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 5:56 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 41 by nator, posted 11-04-2006 8:26 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 68 (361590)
11-04-2006 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by subbie
11-04-2006 4:17 PM


Re: Christians Impose No Laws
subbie writes:
Specific examples, please.
I'll cite one of many so as not to lead off topic. (Embolding mine for emphasis)
Church in Congress Quote writes:
The cornerstone of the Capitol was laid by President George Washington in 1793., but it was not until the end of 1800 that Congress actually moved into the building. According to the congressional records for late November of 1800, Congress spent the first few weeks organizing the Capitol rooms, committees, locations, etc. Then, on December 4, 1800, Congress approved the use of the Capitol building as a church building. 1
The approval of the Capitol for church was given by both the House and the Senate, with House approval being given by Speaker of the House, Frederick Augustus Muhlenberg, and Senate approval being given by the President of the Senate, Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson attended church at the Capitol while he was Vice President 5 and also throughout his presidency. The first Capitol church service that Jefferson attended as President was a service preached by Jefferson’s friend, the Rev. John Leland, on January 3, 1802. 6 Significantly, Jefferson attended that Capitol church service just two days after he penned his famous letter containing the “wall of separation between church and state” metaphor.
http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/search/detail.php?R... - 57k -

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 4:17 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 5:57 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 27 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 6:02 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 42 by nator, posted 11-04-2006 8:29 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 68 (361614)
11-04-2006 6:22 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by subbie
11-04-2006 5:57 PM


Re: Christians Impose No Laws
subbie writes:
As for that particular example, I don't see that as "far more Christianity in government." Church services were held in the Capitol building because, according to the site, there were no church buildings in Washington D.C.
Did you miss this in that link? (Embolding mine for emphasis)
The absence of churches in Washington eventually changed, however. As one Washington citizen reported: “For several years after the seat of government was fixed at Washington, there were but two small [wooden] churches. . . . Now, in 1837 there are 22 churches of brick or stone.” 4 Yet, even after churches began proliferating across the city, religious services still continued at the Capitol until well after the Civil War and Reconstruction.
subbie writes:
People who were in government attended the services, but there's nothing to suggest they were doing so in their capacity as a governmental official. In fact, given that Congress now is opened by a prayer led by a Chaplin employed by the government, I don't find the practice you describe as remarkable in the least.
Are you trying to argue that going from church in Congress attended by supporters of the Constitution utilizing the government's military band is not "far more Christianity in government" than is allowed in government today? Are we going to be reasonable here or am I going to have to ignore some unreasonable arguments so as not to become embroiled in more than I can handle timewise?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 5:57 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 6:35 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 68 (361620)
11-04-2006 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by arachnophilia
11-04-2006 6:04 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
Arach writes:
buzsaw is forbidden the privelege of enforcing his religion.
You people are posting some unreasonable strawmen and I'm not going to needlessly sit here and address it all.
I have shown where what is forbidden as mandated/imposed by law is much of what was allowed by law in the days of the framers of the Constitution. I'm not arguing for more or less. My point is the OP and thread title implication that Christians are imposing religion and that theocratic government is threatened upon the nation is false in that Christians perse do not impose laws. We, like secularists, gays, et al all work to elect lawmakers who make the laws most desireable to us.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 6:04 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 9:55 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 68 (361623)
11-04-2006 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by subbie
11-04-2006 6:35 PM


Re: Christians Impose No Laws
subbie writes:
In the alternative, since your original assertion was that there was "far more Christianty" in goverment in the past than there is now, perhaps you can find another example.
Hey, my friend, there's much more out there. If you can't accept this significant example, nothing more will help you. Do a google on the subject if you want more. I'm not into another thread at this time. One thread at a time is about all I have time for in active participation.
Btw, the link you got your info from was not emboldened so if you missed the info in it it was because you only wanted to read what suited your argument.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 6:35 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by subbie, posted 11-04-2006 7:14 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 68 (361704)
11-04-2006 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by arachnophilia
11-04-2006 9:55 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
Arach writes:
"secularists" is not an organized group. neither is "gays." and secularism does not impose itself on religion;
Neither is Christianity. It consists of many individual groups as do secularists and gays. I don't believe I said secularism imposes itself on religion. I said secularists work towards their interests as do Christians to have imposed laws they support passed by government.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 9:55 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by ringo, posted 11-04-2006 11:51 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 50 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 11:58 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 53 by nator, posted 11-05-2006 6:17 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 68 (361707)
11-04-2006 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by arachnophilia
11-04-2006 10:01 PM


Re: Christians Impose No Laws
Arach writes:
public schools (which are governmental buildings) are regularly used by church groups to this very day. that's the nature of a building for the people. it can be used for anything the people wish to use it for. it does not mean the government is associated with every practice committed within the walls of said building.
and when i vote on tuesday, i'm doing so at a church. chances are there are many other people here doing the same.
Well then, my friend, don't complain when we Christians get our preachers preaching at regular church services in Congress and use the military bands to do the music. Urge your congressman to throw in some $$ as well to pay the preacher and buy choir robes.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by arachnophilia, posted 11-04-2006 10:01 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by arachnophilia, posted 11-05-2006 12:01 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 52 by subbie, posted 11-05-2006 1:15 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 68 (362116)
11-06-2006 9:14 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by ringo
11-04-2006 11:51 PM


Re: Theocracy :vs: Democracy
Your question is well taken and makes a good point since the term Christianity can refer to some very secularist thinking folks. You might want to make that point for those who've lumped all Christians as wanting theocracy as well. My point was meant to convey that most of us want don't want a theocracy. That the more secularist folks work for different laws in government than the more non secularist ones is a given. The implications in this thread made that we less secularist Christians want a theocracy is false in that it's government that imposes laws and we all work to promote laws more suited to our ideology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by ringo, posted 11-04-2006 11:51 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by ringo, posted 11-06-2006 10:56 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 65 by nator, posted 11-06-2006 11:04 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024