Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Theological Creationism and ID ⇒

The Universal Moral Law & Devolution since the Fall

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Universal Moral Law & Devolution since the Fall
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 39 of 189 (348175)
09-11-2006 5:32 PM 		Reply to: Message 33 by mjfloresta
09-11-2006 5:00 PM

On the contrary, that there was no death pre-fall is indicated by the fact that death was a result OF the fall.
​
It is the assertion that there was death pre-fall that is scripturally un-supported
​
I don't know what text you are talking about, but if there was no death prior to the so called 'fall', then the warning would have no meaning.
​
For the warning 'that day you will die' to have any impact or meaning, death had to exist, and had to be known.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by mjfloresta, posted 09-11-2006 5:00 PM mjfloresta has not replied
  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 106 of 189 (348723)
09-13-2006 11:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 99 by mjfloresta
09-13-2006 12:35 AM

Re: a more reasonable answer ....
And, when I read what is written, I agree with Jar.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by mjfloresta, posted 09-13-2006 12:35 AM mjfloresta has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024