What are the Degrees of Fundamentalism?

That is prophetic speaking in the church, or speaking the mind of God, before the canon was completed, and it was not necessarily foretelling.Are you objecting to my explaining God's role in events because you disagree that God has that role in them or because even though it's true I shouldn't be saying it? You've said both, you know. Since you reject the very idea that God directs all events, I see no credibility in your judgment of what I'm doing whatever. Speak that one to yourself, since your attitude toward me leaves quite a bit to be desired.

You are WAY WAY out of line. I never said I was a prophet, all I did was explain some events as God's doing, and they were because everything is. I said prophetic speaking has nothing necessarily to do with foretelling, and I did not claim to predict anything in particular. I merely received a strong leading about America coming up for God's judgment. And telling people God's hand in the event is to God's glory.Did God cause the famine at Elijah's behest, because of Israel's apostasy? and end it the same way? Then such natural events aren't just the natural outworking of the ground's being cursed.IF there is calamity in a city will not God have done it? That's in Amos. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

I don't know Jackson at all, but Benny Hinn is no prophet. He's been exposed for his false theology. I used to be a charismatic too. I prayed a LOT about the errors I was encountering in those circles and I got answers. There is false theology galore, and false spirits as well. YOU are the one who needs to do the serious self-examination, not I.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Oops sorry. I'll stop the off topic posts now.

You appear not to know very much about Hebrew after all:Various recent translations have the idea of calamity, and it's obvious enough from the parallel structure of the sentence. It is disaster, not sin, that is the obvious contrast with "peace," "wellbeing" or "prosperity." And the Hebrew certainly backs it up: Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Some blogger you would put ahead of the many translators of the various Bible versions and the Hebrew key provided? Nonsense.The passage itself ought to be a clue that "evil" means calamity: the parallel between light and dark, then peace and ... what, "sin?" No way. NONpeace, bad times, adversity.Another verse the King James has "evil" for that same Hebrew word: {EDIT: I JUST REREAD YOUR BLOGGER, AND HE AGREES THAT THE HEBREW WORD FOR EVIL CAN MEAN DISTRESS OR HARM. Same as calamity, disaster, etc etc etc. And it makes no sense unless it means this in the passages quoted. So you are completely wrong. I THINK WE'RE ALSO OFF TOPIC HERE. LET'S GET BACK TO THE DEGREES OF FUNDAMENTALISM. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.