Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Will I see Hitler in heaven?
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 52 of 99 (328603)
07-03-2006 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by The Critic
07-03-2006 3:13 PM


Re: I didn't inquire
but jesus hates nazi's
If He hated the Nazi's, why did He sit on his lazy ass and do nothing about them?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by The Critic, posted 07-03-2006 3:13 PM The Critic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by GDR, posted 07-03-2006 4:03 PM Brian has replied
 Message 73 by The Critic, posted 07-05-2006 7:39 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 54 of 99 (328617)
07-03-2006 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by GDR
07-03-2006 4:03 PM


Re: I didn't inquire
Maybe he sent an army to defeat them.
He took His time then didn't He?
Six million of God's chosen people slaughtered while Jesus sat preening His beard, cutting His toenails, washing His shrouds, and helping the Pope count the Vatican billions. Jesus needs a good talking too.
If there wasn't evil in this world then goodness wouldn't be able to exist either.
Aren't you assuming that we live in a dualistic universe?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by GDR, posted 07-03-2006 4:03 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by GDR, posted 07-03-2006 5:26 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 56 by Omnivorous, posted 07-03-2006 5:54 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 60 of 99 (328704)
07-04-2006 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Omnivorous
07-03-2006 8:25 PM


Re: Necessities, contingencies, apologies
Hi Omni,
Babies are not guilty, Ian. You can theologize all you like, but I grew up with baby siblings, baby nieces and nephews, made babies and diapered grandbabies. I was a baby. Babies are not guilty.
But, according to the warped fundy mindset babies are indeed guilty, all of mankind is guilty.
My friend John, who is now teaching in the USA, essentially answered your question when I enquired about the nice old grandma who helps when she can and never insults anyone, where is she going when she dies.
His reply was that she is rancid with sin until she accepts Jesus into her heart, it doesn't matter how nice you are, or how much you help others, everyone is tainted with sin until you accept Jesus' sacrifice and repent.
Remember, when talking to fundies, you need to consider their mindset, they only have a one track mind, the veracity of the Bible, every syllable.
I think the easiest way to reconcile suffering with a loving God is to realise that there is no such thing as God. The concept is very outdate now and the only real growth area for Christianity is in third world countries, or oppressed countries, or wealthy countries with home schooling.
The problem is, some people need the comfort of there being a big daddy in the sky to look after them and give them a reward at the end of it all, and to keep this delusion alive they will accept any pathetic apologetic (of which free will is the saddest) to keep it intact.
Liberating yourself from the suffocation of believing in God doesn't make you a bad person, but it does enable you to be a free thinker, and frees you from racist and sexist legends.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Omnivorous, posted 07-03-2006 8:25 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by CK, posted 07-04-2006 9:24 AM Brian has not replied
 Message 63 by iano, posted 07-04-2006 12:11 PM Brian has replied
 Message 72 by Omnivorous, posted 07-05-2006 9:09 AM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 64 of 99 (328743)
07-04-2006 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by iano
07-04-2006 12:11 PM


Free will again, surprise surprise!
Has a free thinker the free will which is essential to free thinking.
Only when they are free from the restraints of an outdated concept such as theism, or even Christianity. These ideas put limits on the believer's thoughts. For example, a young earther doesn;t have the ability to think about an ancient universe.
If he has, has he free will to do bad and good too?
What is bad and good?
If he has, then what is pathetic about the free will apologetic?
The free will defence is the last bastion of the desparate fundy, when all other apologetics get shot down they wheel out the FWD without even thinking it through.
To have true free will you need to have access to all the possibilites. Take the Eden myth, Adam and Eve didn't know what good or evil was, but if they did do you think if they knew their descendants would all be cursed by this jealous God they would have ate the fruit?
The free will defence is a joke, when the going gets tough the fundy gets the FWD.
You cannot have an all loving God that watches 6 million Jews being slaughtered and does nothing. Oh and before you say He didn;t want to invade the free will of the Nazis, there are many examples of God intervening in human history in the Old Testament. So, we know God has no problem taking sides and actually particpating in the battle against an enemy of Israel (Ai for example, where God killed more enemies than Israel did).
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by iano, posted 07-04-2006 12:11 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by iano, posted 07-04-2006 1:00 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 69 by GDR, posted 07-04-2006 3:13 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 79 of 99 (329346)
07-06-2006 12:02 PM


Undeserved ban
After thinking a lot about The Critic's message, I have come to the conclusion that his lifetime suspension is unwarranted.
The fact that he is a complete dick shouldn't mean that he gets a ban for his beliefs.
If he sincerely believes these reasons then why should he get banned just because it makes us normal folk feel physically sick?
One of the aims of EvC is to educate people, and I think the Critic really needs to be educated, especially on his knowledge of the Bible.
His views are repulsive yes, and I have heard this justified punishment of the Jews argument from Christians before (not many I must add), but just because we think he has gross beliefs, and who is to say he isn't accurate, we shouldn't ban him any more than Iano should be banned for being a bigot. It is just the way they are, incomprehensible stances for normal people to comprehend, but they are entitled to them.
Brian.

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by AdminNWR, posted 07-06-2006 12:19 PM Brian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024