Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can those outside of science credibly speak about science?
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 185 of 198 (292472)
03-05-2006 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by robinrohan
03-05-2006 4:55 PM


Re: Living fallaciously
quote:
I'm talking about real-world logic.
I'm talking about "real world" logic too, because there is no difference between it and formal logic.
Logic is logic no matter where it occurs. That's the neat thing about it.
That you don't understand this fact is yet another indication that you do not understand the issues in this thread.
If you are trying to argue that when given carefully constructed logic problems in a research setting, people are bad at logic, but when thrown into the messy real world to deal with practical issues people are naturally very good at logic, boy are you wrong. The volume of research on how both patients and medical personnel make logical errors in interpreting diagnostic data is staggering (and scary).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 4:55 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 5:19 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 190 of 198 (292493)
03-05-2006 5:47 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by robinrohan
03-05-2006 5:19 PM


Re: Living fallaciously
If you are trying to argue that when given carefully constructed logic problems in a research setting, people are bad at logic, but when thrown into the messy real world to deal with practical issues people are naturally very good at logic, boy are you wrong. The volume of research on how both patients and medical personnel make logical errors in interpreting diagnostic data is staggering (and scary).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 5:19 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 5:57 PM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024