Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What led you to God?
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 241 of 300 (279844)
01-18-2006 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 229 by nwr
01-18-2006 1:27 AM


Re: Did robinrohan say that on purpose?
Robin says that a car has purpose, but that a human does not have purpose
A car has an objective, formal purpose.
Humans have subjective purposes. All subjective purposes are in the long run arbitrary. One might say, my purpose in life is to help poor people. Another might say, my purpose in life is to turn all corners into curves, because curves are more beautiful than corners.
These two purposes are both equally subjective in the long run.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by nwr, posted 01-18-2006 1:27 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by nwr, posted 01-18-2006 12:12 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 243 of 300 (279846)
01-18-2006 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by lfen
01-18-2006 10:55 AM


Re: objective purpose
Well, can you relate purpose to children or the caring for children?
It's another subjective purpose. Take your pick.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 10:55 AM lfen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 245 by Phat, posted 01-18-2006 11:12 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 244 of 300 (279847)
01-18-2006 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 218 by Jon
01-17-2006 6:33 PM


Re: objective purpose
Who is to say that the formal purpose of that car is to get from A to B, and not simply to spin tires really fast? I'd have to wonder if the inventor of the car himself would even be able to list a single formal purpose.
This makes no sense to me. It seems obvious to me that the formal purpose of a car is to propel people around from place to place.
As I said before, one might devise all sorts of other purposes for a car, but none of these are the formal purpose. You could use it as a decorative item. Young boys could use it as a place to hide out and smoke. You could use it as a music-maker and never drive the thing at all. You could use it as research project on toxic emissions. You could use it as the subject of a poem--"Ode on a Chevy." These are all personal purposes, not formal.
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 01-18-2006 10:03 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by Jon, posted 01-17-2006 6:33 PM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:23 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 246 of 300 (279854)
01-18-2006 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 219 by Jon
01-17-2006 6:40 PM


Why should that matter? Dying and rotting in the ground is something I would most desperately like to prevent, but I cannot. So, while I'm sitting here, I think I should make the most of my time.
Well, that's perfectly sensible. I'm telling you what seems to me the fact about the nature of human life. Our lives are ephemeral, of no more significance than the howling wolves, or for that matter, the fly we just swatted.
I'll tell you in what sense this fact matters to me: I'm not interested in maintaining a view of human life that is laced with sentimentality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by Jon, posted 01-17-2006 6:40 PM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:37 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 249 of 300 (279859)
01-18-2006 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 247 by lfen
01-18-2006 11:23 AM


Re: objective purpose
Are you using "purpose" as synonymous with "function" as in use?
That's right.
You are wanting humans to have been designed by something else to be used for some purpose this something else has?
It's not a matter of what I want. I'm just stating what seems to be the nature of human life. We have no objective purpose in living. We have purposes that we make up--that's all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:23 AM lfen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Faith, posted 01-18-2006 12:39 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 255 of 300 (279870)
01-18-2006 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 251 by lfen
01-18-2006 11:37 AM


I suspect only sociopaths are capable of holding a viewpoint that doesn't contain something of sentimentality that is to say are capable of not caring about anyone or anything else in the world.
I'm not talking about "not caring." Of course one cares about other people and about one's activities. A sentimental view of human life is one in which one adopts a certain belief because it makes one feel good (or bad, for that matter), or one slurs over what human life is really like with vague, pleasant-sounding comments, or one ignores what human life is really like completely. By "human life," I mean human life as a whole, not the life of this or that person.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:37 AM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 259 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 3:03 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 256 of 300 (279871)
01-18-2006 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 254 by Faith
01-18-2006 12:49 PM


Re: Did robinrohan say that on purpose?
That's exactly it, Faith.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 254 by Faith, posted 01-18-2006 12:49 PM Faith has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 282 of 300 (280038)
01-19-2006 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by lfen
01-18-2006 2:37 PM


Re: objective purpose
Purpose is not inherent.
Formal purpose is inherent--and objective.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 2:37 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 283 by Jon, posted 01-19-2006 4:04 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 298 by lfen, posted 01-19-2006 10:40 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 284 of 300 (280065)
01-19-2006 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 283 by Jon
01-19-2006 4:04 PM


Re: objective purpose
Is the Martian right? Is he wrong? Can right/wrong be determined in such a scenario?
The Martian has got nothing to do with the formal purpose. The maker of the device determines the purpose. The formal purpose of a wrench is to turn bolts. The formal purpose of a hammer is to hammer nails. It doesn't matter whether a Martian or anyone can figure out what the formal purpose is. But if a made item has a formal purpose, most likely it can be determined by an outsider. But if it can't the formal purpose remains exactly the same.
A Martian might decide that the formal purpose of a human being is to do arithmetic. That's plausible, since humans are good at doing arithmetic. But it's wrong if the maker of the human being is nature. If God made man, then he can possibly have a formal purpose. He cannot possibly have a formal purpose if he was made by mindless accident.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 283 by Jon, posted 01-19-2006 4:04 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 287 by Jon, posted 01-19-2006 5:51 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 286 of 300 (280072)
01-19-2006 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by lfen
01-18-2006 2:37 PM


Re: objective purpose
I just can't yet grasp why it is, or what it is Robin is looking for.
I'm not looking for anything. I am explaining the nature of human life. It lacks a formal, objective purpose.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 2:37 PM lfen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by Jon, posted 01-19-2006 5:52 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 289 by nwr, posted 01-19-2006 6:05 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 290 of 300 (280079)
01-19-2006 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 289 by nwr
01-19-2006 6:05 PM


Re: objective purpose
It would be better to say that humans are above mere formal purpose.
You could put it that way. You would need to add, however, that the subjective purposes that humans do have are ultimately arbitrary.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by nwr, posted 01-19-2006 6:05 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 293 by nwr, posted 01-19-2006 7:19 PM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024