This is the last I'm going to comment about this, becuase I'm not being heard anyway. The following leads one to reject evolution if properly applied to Scripture.
First:
http://www.carm.org/bible/interpret.htm, this give general intepretive guidelines
Second: Rules for interpretation
1. The Bible is its own interpreter.
2. We must interpret the Bible literally-"as it is written".
3. The Bible is to be interpreted like any other book.
4. Obscure parts of the Bible are to be interpreted by the clearer parts.
5. The implicit is to be interpreted in light of the explicit.
6. The rules of logic govern what can reasonably be drawn or deduced from Scripture.
Private interpretation is not a license for subjectivism. The principle of private interpretation carries with it the obligation to seek the correct interpretation of the Bible. Though each biblial text may have multiple applications, it has only one correct meaning.
Third: our aim in interpretation is to find out the meaning rather than to escape from it. We believe that although some passages are hard to understand, the basic message of the Bible is plain and public rather than esoteric and convoluted. To see why we think so, take a look at Isaiah 45:19, Isaiah 48:16 and John 18:20
Fourth: When applying these guidelines and rules on such Scripture as 19:3-8, we see that the very Christ that the bible speaks of, God incarnate, regards the creation acount as somethng that acctually happened as a historical event, the very foundation of marriage is found in the Genesis creation account. God making man and woman fully formed and complete from the beginning and putting the two together is how we know that marriage is between a man and a woman. Now if man came from a single cell, the institution of marriage is simply man made, and what man put together, man can break, but Jesus says otherwise.
3. Pharisees came. As usual, ready to oppose. Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? Hillel, the greatest of the Jewish Rabbins whom Jews have sought to compare with Christ, taught that almost any ground of displeasure on the part of a husband would justify divorce. He even specifies scorching the bread as sufficient cause. Josephus, the historian, says he "divorced his wife because he was not pleased with her manners."
4, 5. Made them male and female. In the creation, God made man male and female and united the two by an indissoluble bond in the marriage of one man to one woman. For this cause. The bond of husband and wife is stronger than that between children and parents. Be one flesh. Two lives joined into one.
6. What God hath joined together. If God hath so joined them that the twain are one, no human ordinance has the right to separate them.
7, 8. Why then did Moses command? Deut. 24:1-4. They insinuate that he contradicts Moses. Moses, for your hardness of heart. Moses "suffered" some things that were not right on account of "the hardness of your heart," a low state of morals. A people cannot be lifted from moral depravity to a high standard at once. Hence the law permitted some things that were below the perfect standard of Christ. In the beginning. In the beginning there was no divorce and no polygamy.
™ Version 4.2
