Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   is the US sliding into Fascism? Evidence for and against
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 160 of 257 (207341)
05-12-2005 8:39 AM
Reply to: Message 155 by nator
05-11-2005 11:33 PM


Re: Not a police state.
Tell me, when did traditional American conservative political values change from "government out of our lives" to "government intrudes upon everyone's personal lives, especially if you are gay, a woman, an activist, a political dissident, or look like you are Arab"?
You have it backwards. Conservatives are trying to get the government out of our lives with their legislation to force us all to adhere to and financially support political programs we detest, and that were never a part of US policy until the PC police took over. Leave us alone, we leave you alone.
This message has been edited by Faith, 05-12-2005 08:43 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by nator, posted 05-11-2005 11:33 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by nator, posted 05-12-2005 9:34 AM Faith has replied
 Message 189 by Silent H, posted 05-12-2005 1:07 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 161 of 257 (207342)
05-12-2005 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by EZscience
05-12-2005 7:19 AM


Re: Fascism: Alive and well in 21st century America
What never seems to get any coverage is how Bush and all the American oil industries that supported him are raking in millions in extra profit from their domestic production as a result of this effort to 'spread democracy'.
Please substantiate these allegations. Otherwise you are engaging in slander.
This message has been edited by Faith, 05-12-2005 08:42 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2005 7:19 AM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2005 9:30 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 169 of 257 (207361)
05-12-2005 9:41 AM
Reply to: Message 166 by EZscience
05-12-2005 9:30 AM


Re: Oil prices...
All that could be true and yet proves nothing about anybody's motivations. That's the slander/libel part, the implication that the war had this purpose.
And I'm not sure I'm following you anyway, which may be because I'm no economist but please explain. Prices go up because of events in the Middle East, our major supplier of oil, but what then, our much less productive domestic oil suppliers benefit from that because the prices go up across the board? Is this what you are saying? And if so, why wouldn't domestic producers benefit more from say, a price war, in which they can sell their product cheaper than the ME suppliers? Something doesn't compute here but I'm not sure exactly what.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2005 9:30 AM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by Alexander, posted 05-12-2005 10:30 AM Faith has not replied
 Message 178 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2005 10:40 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 171 of 257 (207366)
05-12-2005 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 167 by nator
05-12-2005 9:34 AM


Re: Not a police state.
You have it backwards. Conservatives are trying to get the government out of our lives with their legislation to force us all to adhere to and financially support political programs we detest,
quote:
You mean you detest paying taxes to support equal rights for all Americans?
I detest the revisionist redefinitions of rights and freedoms for starters, terms which have been co-opted by the Left and made to apply to personal behaviors, such as homosexuality, which is not the business of government to force on people who have moral objections to it. Freedom means leaving them alone to do as they please in their private lives, but what we are starting to get is a police state tyranny which forces all to legitimize and even subsidize such behavior. More and more the idea of freedom is being twisted to apply to formerly criminalized behavior. While in many cases I can support decriminalization, I can't support official legitimization that requires Christians, for instance, and other likeminded groups, to violate Biblical precepts by treating something as right that the Bible condemns. That is unAmerican and an unconscionable misuse of government power. THIS is the police state, what YOU are supporting.
and that were never a part of US policy until the PC police took over.
quote:
You mean people like Thomas Jefferson?
Just who are these "PC Police" you are talking about?
The Sixties generation basically, now in power, even the terrorists among them, God help us all.
Leave us alone, we leave you alone.
quote:
How is working to pass laws requiring all American children pray to the Christian God in public school "leaving them alone"?
Who is working to pass such laws? The trend has been in the opposite direction for generations now, from originally Christian schools to militant secularism. However, I don't support official prayer in public schools and don't know who you are talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by nator, posted 05-12-2005 9:34 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by nator, posted 05-12-2005 10:40 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 185 of 257 (207406)
05-12-2005 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 178 by EZscience
05-12-2005 10:40 AM


Re: Oil prices...
Now Faith, let's be fair.
I made no inferences about motivations, only about consequences.
What I said was:
It was obvious that an invasion of Iraq would cause oil prices to spike.
Nowhere did I imply that this was the purpose of the war.
But it certainly yielded a windfall for domestic oil interests,
and this is Bush's biggest financial support base.
No matter how I read that, it still ends up "implying that this was the purpose of the war" or at least a BIG purpose of it. Especially when I go back and reread your original statement which still sounds even more like it implies this purpose:
What never seems to get any coverage is how Bush and all the American oil industries that supported him are raking in millions in extra profit from their domestic production as a result of this effort to 'spread democracy'.
Putting "spread democracy" in quotes sure implies some kind of duplicity for starters.
Actually it's not true that it never gets any coverage. It's a pretty common accusation of the Bush administration that the war was *really* about oil and not about any of the things it was said to be about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2005 10:40 AM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2005 11:46 AM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024