Did They Write About Jesus in the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms?

Somebody already proposed a Jewish Bible and of course I wouldn't accept it. The Jews have an aggressively determined program to prove that "almah" does not mean "virgin" although it was Jewish translators of the Septuagint that made the connection in the first place. Some modern translations ahve this too. see Doctorbill's exchange with me. He tried to say all of them do, but he's wrong and I proved it. Now THAT is really a screaming idiocy. It has always meant a literal sexually inexperienced young woman, but now it means something else than that??? As if what it NOW means has anything to do with what it meant THEN which is the point!!! If the words have changed then obvviously what is needed is today's word that means a sexually inexperienced young woman, not the opposite. What is the matter with you people???

I said I haven't studied it yet to know how the passage is structured, but I have the grace to believe honest teachers who have taught that it refers to the virgin conception and birth of Jesus Christ as well as something in Ahaz' time. Sorry you lack that grace.

Not really. Today's KJV is just as corrupted by the newer translational follies as the other translations. So far MOST of the corruptions have remained in the footnotes but not all. What is needed is a completely new translation done under the auspices of Church authorities based on the OLD Greek manuscripts rather than the new ones that underlie the newer translations. This is the best thinking on the subject in my opinion:An orienting column on the subject:Welcome credenda.org - Hostmonster.comA debate between the editor and a defender of the modern translations:Welcome credenda.org - Hostmonster.com No. I consider them interesting but not inspired and after reading through them once years ago I haven't gone back to them. Maccabees contains useful history though.