Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Free will, perfection and limits on god
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 248 (187270)
02-21-2005 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by sidelined
02-10-2005 8:45 AM


I would like to know what the problem is that prevented god from creating a perfect being with free will.
I think god wanted to make a being that could appreciate his love and love him back.
Now, he could have made a perfect being that always loved him, but it kinda would have been like a robot, and not really love. If we love god by default then the value of that love is compromised. God wanted a being that could love him but did not have to love him. Not having to love him and then choosing to love him makes it kick-ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by sidelined, posted 02-10-2005 8:45 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by sidelined, posted 02-21-2005 7:37 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 56 by DominionSeraph, posted 03-10-2005 2:28 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 248 (187331)
02-21-2005 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by sidelined
02-21-2005 7:37 PM


So why does he punish those who do not love him?{according to the bible}
I don't like the idea of god punishing people. I think you punish yourself. Sinning is seperating yourself from god (not loving him) and I think this will hurt you in the end, post death. But I don't think god smites people who don't love because they don't love him.
Heck why does he punish those who do? {Job,Moses}
I dunno...I'm more into the New Testament. Those old jewish stories don't make much sence to me. I think it says that god was testing Job though, some sorta bet with the devil or something, I'm not even that familiar with the Old Testament. So, I'd have to say that he doesn't punish those who do.
Is it necessary for a perfect being to always love?
Nope.
I wasn't trying to imply that either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by sidelined, posted 02-21-2005 7:37 PM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by QBert14000, posted 04-19-2005 6:03 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 248 (187538)
02-22-2005 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by sidelined
02-22-2005 3:09 PM


Re: Looking for a second step.
In other words god also must be a part of the discovery of what is actually there in order to satisfy the original premise that god should not fool us.
If god proved to everyone that he existed then everyone would believe in him. This would make the belief in god worth less. Its like what I said earlier with love, if everyone loved god by default then that love would lose quality. Beilieving in god without proof (faith) is worth more to god than discovering him and then believing.
Also, leaving us record that were designed to mislead us and finding examples of things that really are not as they seem is a lot different than leaving out information that proves his existance. The first two are lying, the third is not.
Without this qualification we can make no discernment between a universe with god and one without can we?
no, we can't and prolly never will.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by sidelined, posted 02-22-2005 3:09 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by sidelined, posted 02-22-2005 11:15 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 183 of 248 (204369)
05-02-2005 4:22 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by QBert14000
05-02-2005 3:20 PM


Re: Free Will
Predetermination is all around and God is its mastermind.
If I believed that I'd lose my respect for god.
When I choose to sin its my choice not gods. If god predetermined everything I could run around sinning till my hearts content and just blame it all on god for predetermining it to happen that way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by QBert14000, posted 05-02-2005 3:20 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 185 by QBert14000, posted 05-02-2005 4:54 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 188 of 248 (204400)
05-02-2005 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by QBert14000
05-02-2005 4:54 PM


Re: Free Will
Do you think that God created the universe exactly according to God's will?
What do you mean?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by QBert14000, posted 05-02-2005 4:54 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by QBert14000, posted 05-02-2005 7:43 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 191 of 248 (204423)
05-02-2005 8:31 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by QBert14000
05-02-2005 7:43 PM


Re: Free Will
Well, I am asking if you think that God created the universe exactly according to God's will? Basically, do you think that God create the universe using God's will, as the Bible suggests?
I don't know what God's will really means, if you could replace these words in the question I could answer it more comfortably. If you are asking if he created it the way he wanted to, then I would say yes. But if you are asking if as the universe passes through time, is god's will being gradually unfolded and therefore his will is continually being fulfilled and thus predetermination, then I would say no.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by QBert14000, posted 05-02-2005 7:43 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by QBert14000, posted 05-03-2005 1:11 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 193 of 248 (204707)
05-03-2005 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 192 by QBert14000
05-03-2005 1:11 PM


Re: Free Will
Then you know my answer is yes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by QBert14000, posted 05-03-2005 1:11 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by QBert14000, posted 05-03-2005 6:49 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 196 of 248 (204752)
05-03-2005 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by QBert14000
05-03-2005 6:49 PM


Re: Free Will
Ok. Do you think God is all-knowing?
I'd say yes, but again its hard to answer comfortably without more context and without knowing where you are going with this. I don't think omniscience neccessarily includes foresight.
Perhaps we could do this more than one question at a time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by QBert14000, posted 05-03-2005 6:49 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by QBert14000, posted 05-03-2005 7:37 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 199 of 248 (204779)
05-03-2005 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by QBert14000
05-03-2005 7:37 PM


Re: Free Will
If God knows something is going to happen, then it will happen because God knows that it will.
I don't think that god's knowledge of something happening is the cause for that thing to happen. God and I know that if I drop a baseball it will fall to the ground but niether of our knowledge of this is the reason the ball falls (but a baseball doesn't have a choice, nor free will).
I think it is possible for god to know what decision I am going to make, but that doesn't prevent me from actually making the decision, I still have the free will to choose which decision. I don't think god plays that active of a role to know every decision I'm going to make before I make it, although he is capable. For example, during my drive home tonight, am I going to change lanes 10 feet after mile marker 15 or will it be 20 feet, perhaps 30. Do you think god knows?
I think god is capable of knowing the answer at any given point in time, but I don't think he does know because it is my choice. I'll decide when I get there and there are an infinite number of factors that could change when I switch lanes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by QBert14000, posted 05-03-2005 7:37 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by sidelined, posted 05-03-2005 9:32 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 202 by QBert14000, posted 05-03-2005 11:56 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 201 of 248 (204796)
05-03-2005 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 200 by sidelined
05-03-2005 9:32 PM


Re: Free Will
If god has knowledge{past tense} then the event he has knowledge of cannot change due to free will else it would negate the knowledge of the event and therefore the knowledge could not have been available to him.
I agree that if god has knowledge of a decision that I'm going to make then the decision must be predetermined and I lose my free will. I believe that god doesn't know every decision I'm going to make and allows me to have free will, but if he wanted to know what I'm going to do then he could take away my free will and know my decision before I make it. For example, by making it impossible for me to make a decision other than the one he predetermined.
This paradox is a consequence of the possesion of knowledge of an event is limited to the speed of light.
I don't think god's knowledge is limited by anything.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by sidelined, posted 05-03-2005 9:32 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by QBert14000, posted 05-04-2005 12:12 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 206 by sidelined, posted 05-04-2005 6:12 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 208 of 248 (204973)
05-04-2005 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by QBert14000
05-04-2005 12:12 AM


Re: Free Will
...or did God create the universe exactly the way God wanted it (which includes laying out a plan for all time)? Here you say that God predetermined a decision that you had to make, which implies that God wanted it to happen that way.
I think god is omniscient and has the power to know the future if he choses to. I don't think god layed out a plan for all time. If this were true then we are all robots, just running the program that god wrote before we were even born. This view would cause me to lose respect for god. I don't think he created a bunch of robots where some are programmed to love him and some are programed to be evil. I think god gives us the choice to love him or to sin. Like I said earlier, if I believed it was all mapped out already I would just run around sinning all the time and then blame it on god for planning my life to be that way. When I sin, its my fault and I chose to sin.
About the painting metaphor:
I don't think god painted the unverse and then later pressed the start button, or said "Go!". I think god is painting the universe as time passes. Now if he wants to use his power to make sure the painting has certain details in the future, I think he is capable. But again, I don't think the painting is finished yet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by QBert14000, posted 05-04-2005 12:12 AM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by QBert14000, posted 05-04-2005 3:10 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 209 of 248 (204975)
05-04-2005 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by sidelined
05-04-2005 6:12 AM


Re: Free Will
since any alteration of actions he takes on your part need have an immediate efect on all other action that will occur after that then what of all the others who's free will is therefore altered?
More than one person might have to lose their free will for something to happen that god specifically wants to happen. Which is another reason I think he would just stay out of it and let me make my own decisions rather than starting the complications.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by sidelined, posted 05-04-2005 6:12 AM sidelined has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 211 of 248 (205001)
05-04-2005 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by QBert14000
05-04-2005 3:10 PM


Re: Free Will
If God is omniscient, then God must know everything. That includes the future.
I disagree. As I said earlier...
me writes:
I don't think omniscience neccessarily includes foresight.
A simply definition for omniscience is all-knowing. I don't think this includes the future. You can know everything without knowing the things that haven't happened yet. This is a difference of opinion, you think omniscience includes knowing everything that will happen and I don't, let's put this part behind us.
If this were true then we are all robots, just running the program that god wrote before we were even born. This view would cause me to lose respect for god.
Really? Why is that?
Check Message 11
You seem to imply that you would choose to run around sinning. If God mapped everything out, you would actually only be running around sinning if God wanted you to be.
Which is why I would lose respect for him. I don't believe that god wants me to sin. I think we chose to sin, we chose to seperate ourselves from god.
Sidelined has begun to address God predetermining or knowing certain details and not others already, so I don't need to repeat that here.
I think god doesn't know whats going to happen in the future by default, but if he wanted to control a part of the future he could.
Now, do animals have free will?
no, I don't think they make conscious decisions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by QBert14000, posted 05-04-2005 3:10 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by QBert14000, posted 05-04-2005 5:54 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 222 of 248 (205349)
05-05-2005 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by QBert14000
05-04-2005 5:54 PM


Re: Free Will
I'll play your logic game.
Well, "everything" means everything, so opinion doesn't really matter. "Everything" is all-inclusive.
But everything doesn't include the future. Something that hasn't happened yet doesn't exist yet and isn't a thing yet so it shouldn't be incuded as a thing in the term everything.
"Everything" is all-inclusive. I think what you are talking about is "almost-omniscience.".....Omniscience is knowing everything about everything, by definition.
Omni- means all, -scient means knowledge. If I believe god is all knowing, or omniscient, I don't have to believe that he knows everything about the future, so, its not "almost-omniscient", it is just "omniscient".
If God controlled a part of the future, then all of the future would have to be controlled, and then necessarily all of the past as well, since past and future are relative terms. If God knows the past, but not the future, and we're talking about someone who lived 200 years into the future, then your life is in that person's past, which God already knows about. Thus, you have no free will.
The past has happened and has existed and can be known. The future has not happened and has not existed and can not be known. They are only reletive to the present and time can only go forward. Something can not go from the past to the future it can only go from the future to the past. I don't understand your view of time.
So if animals don't have free will, they are predetermined.
False.
They are neither predetermined nor do they have free will. The animals are the 'robots' that I see your view makes humans into. Animals' program is to just react to a stimulus via instinct, the reason they aren't predetermined is that the stimuli are "random" and not a part of the program.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by QBert14000, posted 05-04-2005 5:54 PM QBert14000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Ben!, posted 05-05-2005 5:21 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 230 by QBert14000, posted 05-06-2005 6:01 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 224 of 248 (205391)
05-05-2005 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 223 by Ben!
05-05-2005 5:21 PM


Re: Free Will
Thanks for replying.
In other words, if I've got it right, in your view then, for each "possible" environmental input, animals' behavior is predetermined.
yeah, pretty much. Predetermined by instinct. I don't think you'll get the same response for the same input every time though. An unpleasant input repeated would yield a different response the second time. Though, you could say the input was 2 part and the program said X for part 1 and Y for part 2, or something like that.
But the ACTUAL behavior is not predetermined, because the ACTUAL environmental input is unknown.
yeah, and there are so many variables.
Is this the way you see things too? Do you think free will exists?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Ben!, posted 05-05-2005 5:21 PM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Ben!, posted 05-05-2005 8:29 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024