|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5938 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Free will, perfection and limits on god | |||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
I would like to know what the problem is that prevented god from creating a perfect being with free will. I think god wanted to make a being that could appreciate his love and love him back. Now, he could have made a perfect being that always loved him, but it kinda would have been like a robot, and not really love. If we love god by default then the value of that love is compromised. God wanted a being that could love him but did not have to love him. Not having to love him and then choosing to love him makes it kick-ass.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
So why does he punish those who do not love him?{according to the bible} I don't like the idea of god punishing people. I think you punish yourself. Sinning is seperating yourself from god (not loving him) and I think this will hurt you in the end, post death. But I don't think god smites people who don't love because they don't love him.
Heck why does he punish those who do? {Job,Moses} I dunno...I'm more into the New Testament. Those old jewish stories don't make much sence to me. I think it says that god was testing Job though, some sorta bet with the devil or something, I'm not even that familiar with the Old Testament. So, I'd have to say that he doesn't punish those who do.
Is it necessary for a perfect being to always love? Nope.I wasn't trying to imply that either.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
In other words god also must be a part of the discovery of what is actually there in order to satisfy the original premise that god should not fool us. If god proved to everyone that he existed then everyone would believe in him. This would make the belief in god worth less. Its like what I said earlier with love, if everyone loved god by default then that love would lose quality. Beilieving in god without proof (faith) is worth more to god than discovering him and then believing. Also, leaving us record that were designed to mislead us and finding examples of things that really are not as they seem is a lot different than leaving out information that proves his existance. The first two are lying, the third is not.
Without this qualification we can make no discernment between a universe with god and one without can we? no, we can't and prolly never will.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Predetermination is all around and God is its mastermind. If I believed that I'd lose my respect for god. When I choose to sin its my choice not gods. If god predetermined everything I could run around sinning till my hearts content and just blame it all on god for predetermining it to happen that way.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Do you think that God created the universe exactly according to God's will? What do you mean?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Well, I am asking if you think that God created the universe exactly according to God's will? Basically, do you think that God create the universe using God's will, as the Bible suggests? I don't know what God's will really means, if you could replace these words in the question I could answer it more comfortably. If you are asking if he created it the way he wanted to, then I would say yes. But if you are asking if as the universe passes through time, is god's will being gradually unfolded and therefore his will is continually being fulfilled and thus predetermination, then I would say no.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Then you know my answer is yes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Ok. Do you think God is all-knowing? I'd say yes, but again its hard to answer comfortably without more context and without knowing where you are going with this. I don't think omniscience neccessarily includes foresight. Perhaps we could do this more than one question at a time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
If God knows something is going to happen, then it will happen because God knows that it will. I don't think that god's knowledge of something happening is the cause for that thing to happen. God and I know that if I drop a baseball it will fall to the ground but niether of our knowledge of this is the reason the ball falls (but a baseball doesn't have a choice, nor free will). I think it is possible for god to know what decision I am going to make, but that doesn't prevent me from actually making the decision, I still have the free will to choose which decision. I don't think god plays that active of a role to know every decision I'm going to make before I make it, although he is capable. For example, during my drive home tonight, am I going to change lanes 10 feet after mile marker 15 or will it be 20 feet, perhaps 30. Do you think god knows? I think god is capable of knowing the answer at any given point in time, but I don't think he does know because it is my choice. I'll decide when I get there and there are an infinite number of factors that could change when I switch lanes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
If god has knowledge{past tense} then the event he has knowledge of cannot change due to free will else it would negate the knowledge of the event and therefore the knowledge could not have been available to him. I agree that if god has knowledge of a decision that I'm going to make then the decision must be predetermined and I lose my free will. I believe that god doesn't know every decision I'm going to make and allows me to have free will, but if he wanted to know what I'm going to do then he could take away my free will and know my decision before I make it. For example, by making it impossible for me to make a decision other than the one he predetermined.
This paradox is a consequence of the possesion of knowledge of an event is limited to the speed of light. I don't think god's knowledge is limited by anything.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
...or did God create the universe exactly the way God wanted it (which includes laying out a plan for all time)? Here you say that God predetermined a decision that you had to make, which implies that God wanted it to happen that way. I think god is omniscient and has the power to know the future if he choses to. I don't think god layed out a plan for all time. If this were true then we are all robots, just running the program that god wrote before we were even born. This view would cause me to lose respect for god. I don't think he created a bunch of robots where some are programmed to love him and some are programed to be evil. I think god gives us the choice to love him or to sin. Like I said earlier, if I believed it was all mapped out already I would just run around sinning all the time and then blame it on god for planning my life to be that way. When I sin, its my fault and I chose to sin. About the painting metaphor: I don't think god painted the unverse and then later pressed the start button, or said "Go!". I think god is painting the universe as time passes. Now if he wants to use his power to make sure the painting has certain details in the future, I think he is capable. But again, I don't think the painting is finished yet.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
since any alteration of actions he takes on your part need have an immediate efect on all other action that will occur after that then what of all the others who's free will is therefore altered? More than one person might have to lose their free will for something to happen that god specifically wants to happen. Which is another reason I think he would just stay out of it and let me make my own decisions rather than starting the complications.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
If God is omniscient, then God must know everything. That includes the future. I disagree. As I said earlier...
me writes: I don't think omniscience neccessarily includes foresight. A simply definition for omniscience is all-knowing. I don't think this includes the future. You can know everything without knowing the things that haven't happened yet. This is a difference of opinion, you think omniscience includes knowing everything that will happen and I don't, let's put this part behind us.
If this were true then we are all robots, just running the program that god wrote before we were even born. This view would cause me to lose respect for god. Really? Why is that? Check Message 11 You seem to imply that you would choose to run around sinning. If God mapped everything out, you would actually only be running around sinning if God wanted you to be. Which is why I would lose respect for him. I don't believe that god wants me to sin. I think we chose to sin, we chose to seperate ourselves from god.
Sidelined has begun to address God predetermining or knowing certain details and not others already, so I don't need to repeat that here. I think god doesn't know whats going to happen in the future by default, but if he wanted to control a part of the future he could.
Now, do animals have free will? no, I don't think they make conscious decisions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
I'll play your logic game.
Well, "everything" means everything, so opinion doesn't really matter. "Everything" is all-inclusive. But everything doesn't include the future. Something that hasn't happened yet doesn't exist yet and isn't a thing yet so it shouldn't be incuded as a thing in the term everything.
"Everything" is all-inclusive. I think what you are talking about is "almost-omniscience.".....Omniscience is knowing everything about everything, by definition. Omni- means all, -scient means knowledge. If I believe god is all knowing, or omniscient, I don't have to believe that he knows everything about the future, so, its not "almost-omniscient", it is just "omniscient".
If God controlled a part of the future, then all of the future would have to be controlled, and then necessarily all of the past as well, since past and future are relative terms. If God knows the past, but not the future, and we're talking about someone who lived 200 years into the future, then your life is in that person's past, which God already knows about. Thus, you have no free will. The past has happened and has existed and can be known. The future has not happened and has not existed and can not be known. They are only reletive to the present and time can only go forward. Something can not go from the past to the future it can only go from the future to the past. I don't understand your view of time.
So if animals don't have free will, they are predetermined. False. They are neither predetermined nor do they have free will. The animals are the 'robots' that I see your view makes humans into. Animals' program is to just react to a stimulus via instinct, the reason they aren't predetermined is that the stimuli are "random" and not a part of the program.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Thanks for replying.
In other words, if I've got it right, in your view then, for each "possible" environmental input, animals' behavior is predetermined. yeah, pretty much. Predetermined by instinct. I don't think you'll get the same response for the same input every time though. An unpleasant input repeated would yield a different response the second time. Though, you could say the input was 2 part and the program said X for part 1 and Y for part 2, or something like that.
But the ACTUAL behavior is not predetermined, because the ACTUAL environmental input is unknown. yeah, and there are so many variables. Is this the way you see things too? Do you think free will exists?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024