I read carefully what you said but don't know the problem.
Percy introduced suddenly about timescales, which indeed is dating/geology subject, not me.
Its not for me to prove wrong dating methods! And of coarse not for me to accept them as a premise! Its for the other guy who is making the claim to back up another claim.
This subject has drifted from the fish to geology.
I can't believe your telling a creationist he must accept TOe dating ideas. Thats the whole point of this debate! Everthing is interconnected here.
Dating ideas isn't in my orbit anyway.
I see nothing wrong in my debate with Percy. It simply has come down logically once more to evidence about past events and the questioning thereof.
Rob