|
Author
|
Topic: Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution
|
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 31 of 299 (74042)
12-18-2003 8:07 AM
|
Reply to: Message 29 by Dr Jack
12-18-2003 7:56 AM
|
|
Wrong again, I'm afraid. But closer. It must be something with a tail... DT [This message has been edited by Darwinsterrier, 12-18-2003]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 29 by Dr Jack, posted 12-18-2003 7:56 AM | | Dr Jack has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 32 by Dr Jack, posted 12-18-2003 8:11 AM | | Darwin's Terrier has not replied | | | Message 33 by Coragyps, posted 12-18-2003 10:04 AM | | Darwin's Terrier has replied |
|
Dr Jack
Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: 07-14-2003 Member Rating: 8.3
|
Wrong again, I'm afraid. But closer. It must be something with a tail... See I figured you were emphasising that just to mislead us... Well, it's got obvious rear 'legs' but no clear sign of any forward limbs... Kangaroo?
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
It's your earliest baby picture, DT. 
|
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 34 of 299 (74073)
12-18-2003 10:15 AM
|
Reply to: Message 33 by Coragyps
12-18-2003 10:04 AM
|
|
...and the first smartarse who says 'you haven't changed a bit!' will get added to the Kent Hovind Newsletter distribution   But it can't be human... we don't have tails! Oh, wait... we've got a coccyx... nah, that can't be right... (Eddited fro tyop) [This message has been edited by Darwinsterrier, 12-18-2003]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 33 by Coragyps, posted 12-18-2003 10:04 AM | | Coragyps has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 35 by Dr Jack, posted 12-18-2003 10:40 AM | | Darwin's Terrier has not replied |
|
Dr Jack
Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: 07-14-2003 Member Rating: 8.3
|
But it can't be human... we don't have tails! Oh, wait... we've got a coccyx... nah, that can't be right... Exactly! It must be a kangaroo! Do I get a lolipop?
|
Dr Jack
Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: 07-14-2003 Member Rating: 8.3
|
Oh, and since it seems all Willowtree is willing to bring to this thread is a temper tantrum, doesn't it render the thread rather aimless?
|
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 37 of 299 (74088)
12-18-2003 10:57 AM
|
|
|
Okay, what's that 'cat' up the tree then? Are there any baraminologists who'd like to comment? Yes, this is aimless... but no more futile than most of these discussions, I'd guess...
|
Cthulhu
Member (Idle past 5882 days) Posts: 273 From: Roe Dyelin Joined: 09-09-2003
|
Ooh! Ooh! Can I answer?
Is it a fossa? ------------------ Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 39 of 299 (74153)
12-18-2003 5:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 11 by John Paul
12-17-2003 11:29 PM
|
|
Re: Similarities of two sorts.
jp, I think the presence of shared pseudogenes, eg. GLO pleudogene, supports the claim of common ancestry for humans and chimpanzee. At the same time it is strong evidence against convergent evolution of the 2 species. How could convergen evolution explain possession of a non-functional gene by two different species?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 11 by John Paul, posted 12-17-2003 11:29 PM | | John Paul has not replied |
|
The Elder
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 40 of 299 (74160)
12-18-2003 7:03 PM
|
Reply to: Message 18 by The Elder
12-18-2003 3:32 AM
|
|
bump [This message has been edited by The Elder, 12-18-2003]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 18 by The Elder, posted 12-18-2003 3:32 AM | | The Elder has not replied |
|
The Elder
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 41 of 299 (74161)
12-18-2003 7:04 PM
|
Reply to: Message 20 by Zhimbo
12-18-2003 5:23 AM
|
|
The Thyl acine should be referd to as the "Thyl acine", not the Tasmanian Tiger/Tasmanian Wolf, that is what I am trying to point out. ------------------ The Elder [This message has been edited by The Elder, 12-20-2003]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by Zhimbo, posted 12-18-2003 5:23 AM | | Zhimbo has not replied |
|
The Elder
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 42 of 299 (74162)
12-18-2003 7:09 PM
|
Reply to: Message 21 by Zhimbo
12-18-2003 5:24 AM
|
|
What's so special about that sample? Why does it contradict convergent evolution? It seems to me that the Thyl acine has such a phenotypic makeup wolf/tiger, because of herditary descendent. ------------------ The Elder [This message has been edited by The Elder, 12-20-2003]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 21 by Zhimbo, posted 12-18-2003 5:24 AM | | Zhimbo has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 44 by NosyNed, posted 12-18-2003 7:53 PM | | The Elder has replied | | | Message 47 by mark24, posted 12-19-2003 4:25 AM | | The Elder has replied |
|
The Elder
Inactive Member
|
Read other posts, No comment on your entire post because it seems of little importence. ------------------ The Elder
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
|
|
Message 44 of 299 (74167)
12-18-2003 7:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 42 by The Elder
12-18-2003 7:09 PM
|
|
Decent
It seems to me that the Thylicine has such a phenotypic makeup wolf/tiger, because of herditary descendent. Are you saying the thylicine (thanks for spelling correction) is "similar" to a wolf/tiger because it is a descendent of a wolf/tiger kind? That the thylicine is a decendent of a wolf or vice versa? As for your "bump" of the "That is not a difference really." post of yours. Could you explain how different or similar you think the skulls are? To catch up we are discussing Milton's "virtually identical" skulls are we not? If you think they are "virtually identical" that it would take an expert zoologist to tell them apart (as Milton suggests) then I suggest you look again. Is your decent comment suggesting that you think they will have a close genetic affinity? That is, of course, a good scientific approach. You have determined a specific test which could distinguish between what Milton is saying and what biologists would say. Could you elaborate on what it is that you are actually saying?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 42 by The Elder, posted 12-18-2003 7:09 PM | | The Elder has replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
|
Message 45 of 299 (74169)
12-18-2003 8:04 PM
|
Reply to: Message 44 by NosyNed
12-18-2003 7:53 PM
|
|
Spelling
Thylacine is the correct spelling.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 44 by NosyNed, posted 12-18-2003 7:53 PM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 46 by Coragyps, posted 12-18-2003 8:35 PM | | Coragyps has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2