Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution
q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 207 of 299 (82414)
02-03-2004 12:19 AM


The evidence against evolution is found primarily in Genesis. However, there are some excellent peer reviewed literature sources such as Answers in Genesis, Institute for Creation Research, and of course the Intelligent Design movement. I think you'll find some excellent refuation of evolutionary claims there. But specifically, observe that the created kinds have never been known to give rise to some other kind. Were that not the case, we'd have to accept evolution. Observe secondly that the fossils we have found for animals that are extinct can not be shown to be members of extant kinds. Thus, there has been no establishment that there is a factual evidenciary basis for evolutionary theory on the fossil record. I might add that since the Ark was found we have positively confirmed the flood episode and put to rest the claim that Noah was a myth.
There's some things for starters.

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by NosyNed, posted 02-03-2004 1:38 AM q3psycho has not replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 209 of 299 (82445)
02-03-2004 1:50 AM


Hi Nosy Ned. yes I think wyatt is the name of the archaeologist who has found it:
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark-07.htm
They have a visitors center there. They also found pieces of wood that were deck timbers.

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by NosyNed, posted 02-03-2004 2:01 AM q3psycho has not replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 211 of 299 (82460)
02-03-2004 2:32 AM


I read what you showed me Nosy Ned. It seems they don't like Wyatt so much on this site. But on other sites they like him very much.
The site you gave me said nobody has really been back there in a while. So maybe we need a new expedition.

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by Cthulhu, posted 02-03-2004 2:02 PM q3psycho has not replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 213 of 299 (82783)
02-03-2004 6:46 PM


well, they never found the missing link either. But you are still looking, right?

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by wj, posted 02-03-2004 6:59 PM q3psycho has not replied
 Message 215 by Loudmouth, posted 02-03-2004 7:29 PM q3psycho has replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 217 of 299 (82813)
02-03-2004 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by Loudmouth
02-03-2004 7:29 PM


You guys - I will look at what you have to say but you have to do the same for me.
did you look at the picture? I read the articles you showed me. But I wanted to see pictures about what they were talking about and they didn't have any.
I wish you would be nicer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Loudmouth, posted 02-03-2004 7:29 PM Loudmouth has not replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 218 of 299 (82817)
02-03-2004 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by Brian
02-03-2004 7:31 PM


yes, he is. he's the link between Man and God.
The evidence is all over the place. They found many of the places the Bible talked about. Also, a Russian scientist just proved that the red sea can be parted with a wind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Brian, posted 02-03-2004 7:31 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by crashfrog, posted 02-03-2004 7:44 PM q3psycho has not replied
 Message 220 by Brian, posted 02-03-2004 7:51 PM q3psycho has not replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 230 of 299 (82915)
02-04-2004 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 222 by wj
02-03-2004 9:10 PM


Now, now Mr. Aussie WJ - A troll sits under a bridge and gobbles up little dollups.
A couple of you suggested that Romeo & Juliet were stories that were made up but that had real cities in them.
But the evidence I am submitting is the opposite. The Bible isn't a novel. It is history. Some challenge it. So every archaeological discovery adds to its truthfulness. Archaeology is evidence. You know they found Jericho and the evidence was that the walls came down like the Bible said.
Now we also have the fact that if we came from a common ancestor then we should be able to interbreed. It sounds silly, but humans should be able to breed with donkeys if they have the same ancestor.
But the Bible says each after its own kind. No interbreeding. That makes a lot more sense to me! So no common ancestors according to the Bible.
This right here disproves evolution. How can we have the same ancestor as a chicken? It's just a story.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by wj, posted 02-03-2004 9:10 PM wj has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 231 by NosyNed, posted 02-04-2004 12:45 AM q3psycho has replied
 Message 236 by hitchy, posted 02-04-2004 11:57 PM q3psycho has replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 246 of 299 (83822)
02-06-2004 6:11 AM
Reply to: Message 231 by NosyNed
02-04-2004 12:45 AM


Well Nosy,I'm just following what I am told and using common sense. To the best of my ability. Now if we have a common ancestor we're relatives. We're the same kind. Now, I must admit I have trouble seeing a donky and me having the same ancestor. But if we did, as long as the donkey is more distant than second cousin then I can marry the donkey. Ugh.
I can't explain it better than that. If we had the same ancestor then we're the same kind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by NosyNed, posted 02-04-2004 12:45 AM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by NosyNed, posted 02-06-2004 9:38 AM q3psycho has not replied
 Message 259 by Cthulhu, posted 02-10-2004 12:20 AM q3psycho has not replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 247 of 299 (83825)
02-06-2004 6:25 AM
Reply to: Message 236 by hitchy
02-04-2004 11:57 PM


Re: again and again and again...
What evidence? Well I just saw it on the history channel, that's all. I don't remember a lot of the details except they were saying that it had been found and the walls had tumbled down.
So the exodus - I'm not sure exactly what you are looking for there. They left egypt. So you want campsites or something? I suppose they'd be big enough to leave some evidence I guess. Once you found where they were. About the conquests? I just don't know, sorry.
I'm trying to read some stuff on evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by hitchy, posted 02-04-2004 11:57 PM hitchy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 249 by hitchy, posted 02-07-2004 12:06 AM q3psycho has not replied

q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 268 of 299 (86228)
02-14-2004 3:32 AM


What's so intelligent about the pyramids? They built a scale model and then did the real thing. It's impressive, but I think sending a space ship to mars is a little more challenging.
They show cave man paintings and talk about how smart the cave men were too. So why were they living in caves instead of apartments on fifth avenue? Maybe the opera is better over on the cave side of town.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024