I don't think your quasi-Vulcan objectivity is even worth that much. Dawkins was characteristically forthright in announcing his disgust with Milton's work, but he also accused Milton's publishers of irresponsibility for their failure to submit
Shattering the Myths of Darwinism to any reasonable professional review process. In other words, if Milton expected his work to be taken seriously as science, he should have insisted that it be reviewed by scientists
before it was published. Otherwise, he's like a chess player who doesn't play by the rules, but thinks he can beat Kasparov. It's his opinion, but it's not chess.
You've never made clear your views on any subject, Thronacx, except that we all have our preconceptions. Tell us something we don't know.
------------------
The dark nursery of evolution is very dark indeed.
Brad McFall