|
Author
|
Topic: Some Evidence Against Evolution
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
|
Message 28 of 309 (69531)
11-27-2003 1:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 27 by Sonic
11-27-2003 1:31 AM
|
|
Common creator??? Please explain.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 27 by Sonic, posted 11-27-2003 1:31 AM | | Sonic has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 29 by Sonic, posted 11-27-2003 1:43 AM | | roxrkool has not replied |
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
|
Message 58 of 309 (70233)
12-01-2003 8:28 AM
|
Reply to: Message 57 by Dr Jack
12-01-2003 7:05 AM
|
|
Hmmm, I thought JIM's definition was basically correct while the points you mentioned are evidence in support of evolution. 
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 57 by Dr Jack, posted 12-01-2003 7:05 AM | | Dr Jack has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 59 by Dr Jack, posted 12-01-2003 8:38 AM | | roxrkool has not replied |
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 64 of 309 (70261)
12-01-2003 11:32 AM
|
Reply to: Message 63 by Dr Jack
12-01-2003 11:10 AM
|
|
I guess what we need to find out is whether JIM meant to define the Theory of Evolution, which you and others have aptly defined/described, or the word evolution (biological, that is). They are separate entities, are they not?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 63 by Dr Jack, posted 12-01-2003 11:10 AM | | Dr Jack has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 67 by sfs, posted 12-01-2003 12:44 PM | | roxrkool has not replied |
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
Re: Amazing
Gilgamesh, I think you may be right.
quote:
He states that is still at school (?), but responds like my old wizzened church elders used to: which makes me very suspicious. I remember the feigned air of tolerance to questions, total avoidance (or appeals to faith) of difficult ones, constant descent into intellectually useless apologetics, and extraoridanry evasiveness. I still remember the uncomfortable smiles, the condescending tones and I especially remember how quick they were to anger, being "men of God" as they were.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 162 by Gilgamesh, posted 12-10-2003 7:53 PM | | Gilgamesh has not replied |
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
Come on, tell us are YOU Dr. Gene Scott?
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
|
Message 203 of 309 (72447)
12-12-2003 12:48 AM
|
Reply to: Message 201 by Rei
12-11-2003 11:57 PM
|
|
Rei, I'm getting the feeling WILLOW doesn't know what 'evidence' is, so it's no surprise his/her experts aren't even qualified scientists. T Though I suspect it really doesn't even matter to WILLOW - an expert is an expert.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 201 by Rei, posted 12-11-2003 11:57 PM | | Rei has not replied |
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
quote:
Darwinsterrier: Perhaps you could tell us what sources you are using for your own ideas please? Just so we can understand each other, of course.
It seems WILLOW's sources are: 1) Professor Huston Smith author of "Why Religion Matters;" 2) Daniel Harbour author of "An Intelligent Persons Guide to Atheism;" 3) the best preacher in the world, Dr.Gene Scott; and 4) Richard Milton, the non-creationist challenger of the ToE. Maybe you need to read these instead of what you've obviously wasted years reading.  [This message has been edited by roxrkool, 12-12-2003]
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
So who's going to travel the world and tell all the other scientists the gig is up? ME ME ME ME!!!! Perty pleez!
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
Yeah, I'm going to NZ! I'll need about a month or two. shhhhhhhh.....
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 218 by Dan Carroll, posted 12-12-2003 12:52 PM | | Dan Carroll has not replied |
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 225 of 309 (72575)
12-12-2003 5:16 PM
|
Reply to: Message 224 by wj
12-12-2003 4:11 PM
|
|
Re: The end is in sight?
My thoughts are that WILLOWTREE thinks he has provided that evidence, but everyone else is too stupid/ignorant/blind to see it. WILLOWTREE doesn't know what scientific evidence is and that's the problem.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 224 by wj, posted 12-12-2003 4:11 PM | | wj has not replied |
|
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1020 days) Posts: 1497 From: Nevada Joined: 03-23-2003
|
quote:
As you know he has a Ph.D. from Stanford. His Ph.D. is from the university itself and not from any department which makes it the most prestigious.
Why is that more prestigious? Most universities have inter-disciplinary studies.
quote:
Comfort yourself with your standard of rational enquiry, Dr.Scott's standard is to read every book ever written on a subject THEN open ones mouth.
So are you saying that, in order for Dr. Scott to discuss creation, he read every single book written on the topic of evolution? And geology? And physics? And chemistry? And cosmology? And genetics?
quote:
Shut up punk
Nice. edited to add:
quote:
His IQ is 202 and he is the only person that I know of who demands that nobody send any money to him unless it is in response to his teaching and to pay what you think it is worth. That is the criteria.
Dr. Gene Scott might not "demand" people send him money (I don't know of any televangelists that do, actually), but he'll sell you one of his "recently located original bound copies of his 1953 masters thesis and 1957 doctoral dissertation" for $300 a piece. Or signed for $1,000. What I want to know is just how many bound copies did he make back in 1953 and 1957? And why would you make more than are required? I mean it's not like he knew at the time he was going to be a world famous, genius, philosophizing televangelist. Right? [This message has been edited by roxrkool, 12-12-2003]
|
™ Version 4.2
