Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,922 Year: 4,179/9,624 Month: 1,050/974 Week: 9/368 Day: 9/11 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Some Evidence Against Evolution

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Some Evidence Against Evolution
Peter
Member (Idle past 1510 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 37 of 309 (69561)
11-27-2003 7:14 AM 		Reply to: Message 34 by Sonic
11-27-2003 2:45 AM

Which is more credible to you:
​
1) An explanation supported but multiple lines of investigation
in varying fields, carried out with rigour, and assessed by peer
review.
​
OR
​
2) An explanation based upon a 3000 year old book of unknown
origin, which is unverifiable via external sources, and has
a history of inaccurate translation between multiple lanuages.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Sonic, posted 11-27-2003 2:45 AM Sonic has not replied
Peter
Member (Idle past 1510 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 39 of 309 (69563)
11-27-2003 7:16 AM 		Reply to: Message 21 by Cold Foreign Object
11-26-2003 9:59 PM

You are quite right.
​
There are no transitional bones that show that humans
came from apes.
​
What has that to do with evolution?
​
Evolutionary theory does not say that humans evolved from
apes. We and modern apes have a common ancestor -- that's
what the theory of evolution claims, and that's what is
supported by evidence unearthed so far.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-26-2003 9:59 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Dr Jack, posted 11-27-2003 7:53 AM Peter has replied
 Message 70 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 12-01-2003 8:13 PM Peter has seen this message but not replied
Peter
Member (Idle past 1510 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 46 of 309 (69675)
11-28-2003 4:11 AM 		Reply to: Message 41 by Dr Jack
11-27-2003 7:53 AM

I meant modern apes ... sorry.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Dr Jack, posted 11-27-2003 7:53 AM Dr Jack has not replied
Peter
Member (Idle past 1510 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 83 of 309 (70560)
12-02-2003 11:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 82 by Dan Carroll
12-02-2003 9:12 AM

What about .... PIN number !?!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Dan Carroll, posted 12-02-2003 9:12 AM Dan Carroll has not replied
Peter
Member (Idle past 1510 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 84 of 309 (70561)
12-02-2003 11:13 AM 		Reply to: Message 76 by Cold Foreign Object
12-01-2003 8:56 PM

quote:
I reject evolution on the basis that it does not make sense BECAUSE it refuses to seat God as a possibilty at the creation table. The Bible says that God created in such a way that His invisible attributes can be DEDUCED from what is made. Science makes deducements all the time but it WILL not deduce the hand of God as being the initiator. To be continued.
​
Then reject no more ... there is nothing in the theory of evolution
that precludes the possibility of a creating God ... only
that his hand in the diversity of life was one of 'putting the
wheels in motion.'
​
I don't think one can deduce the hand of God, though (unless
you are talking about a certain soccer travesty ).
This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 12-01-2003 8:56 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024