Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,919 Year: 4,176/9,624 Month: 1,047/974 Week: 6/368 Day: 6/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is a literal reading of the Bible an insult to its authors?
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 4 of 187 (476194)
07-21-2008 9:36 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Brian
07-21-2008 1:01 PM


Re Nineveh
Brian writes:
To begin with, there are at least 4 major problems regarding the City of Nineveh.
Why no documentation?
Brian writes:
1. There was no such person as "The King of Nineveh", Nineveh was not a kingdom.
Are you sure?
I thought that Nineveh was the capital of Assyria during the time of Jonah. If it was the capital then the King would live in one of the many palaces archaeological evidence informs us of.
Brian writes:
3. The size of the city is greatly exaggerated. The Bible claims that it would take three days to go from one side of Nineveh to the other side, but archaeological evidence informs us that the city's entire circumference is just less than 8 miles.
The walled of part of the city was less than 8 miles in circumference. Do you think they could cram everybody inside the walls.
Since Assur was the old capital and was about 60 miles away, why would it and everything in-between not be part of the city?
Before you say that can't be let me introduce you to Jacksonville, Florida.
You can find lots of information Here
Duval county is over 840 square miles! This massive size of the county had given Jacksonville the distinction of being the largest city in the US in land mass. In population, Jacksonville Florida reportedly ranks 14 in city size.
That would be a little more than 3 days journey by foot.
Brian writes:
4. The population of Nineveh is hinted at when we are told that there was 120 000 children in the city, which would mean when we added adults we could have over half a million people living there, a figure that is clearly unrealistic.
Where do you get your information from?
Jonah 4:11 And should not I spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more then sixscore thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?
Persons not children.
Sixscore - 120.
Sixscore thousand = 120,000 persons.
It says more than but not how many more.
Brian writes:
We then have the problems of the miraculous.
What is wrong with a miracle?
Brian writes:
We have to accept that a man could live unscathed for three days inside the belly of a "great fish"
You don't have to accept anything.
Who said he was unscathed. It would have more convincing if he was white as a sheet. Since the Assyrians had a fish god they worshiped. That would explain why all the city repented. If after three days the people on the boat that threw Jonah overboard happened to be on shore when the fish deposited Jonah on land. They would tell everybody what they saw and Jonah would have become a god like the half man half fish items show the Assyrians worshiped.
Brian writes:
(the author of Matthew has Jesus wrongly identify the creature as a whale),
Kh'to transliterated ketos = Sea monster, huge fish, whale.
So what is wrong about it? This word is used one time in the bible.
There is no need for me to bother with the miracles as you don't believe in them.
Brian writes:
There is also much in the Book of Jonah that is simply not plausible. We are asked to accept that a stranger just walked into Nineveh and everyone, including the king, simply said "okay, we will convert to your faith",
As pointed out above their accepting Jonah as god should have been no problem for them.
Nowhere does it say anything about them CONVERTING to his faith. They were told they had to repent or destruction was coming in 40 days.
Brian writes:
Was Jonah multilingual, or did he have a translator with him to discuss his faith with the Ninevites?
Since Jonah had spent his entire life under Assyrian rule it is very plausible that he spoke the language.
Brian writes:
Is it reasonable to accept that while inside the fish this man had the calmness to compose a psalm to God?
I understood he offered up a prayer. You don't have to be comfortable to do that.
Brian writes:
The authors' decision to call the hero 'Jonah' is quite clever, and a very strong clue that we should not take the text at face value. The name Jonah means 'dove',
Ah yes God send's His pure sweet love on the wings of a dove.
John 1:32 And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.
Brian writes:
So, if we conclude that when the authors refer to 'Jonah' they are actually referring to Israel, and this allegory carries on strongly throughout the entire book. Jonah's reluctance to preach to the Gentiles mirrors perfectly the nation of Israel's refusal to do the same. Throughout the entire Old Testament we are constantly reminded that it is Israel who is God's chosen one, Israel has a unique relationship with Yahweh, and the OT writers are very keen to remind us of that.
Do you have anything other than the imagination of your mind to suggest why I should conclude what you did.
Brian writes:
but taking it as allegory certainly solves a lot of problems.
It creates a much larger problem than it fixes.
To call it an allegory is to call Jesus a liar.
Brian writes:
Therefore, are people who take a literalist approach to the biblical texts insulting its authors?
You can call insult Jesus and call Him a liar if you want to.
I am going to take Him at His Word for He said:
Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Brian, posted 07-21-2008 1:01 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-23-2008 5:19 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 38 by Brian, posted 07-24-2008 5:01 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 16 of 187 (476333)
07-22-2008 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Brian
07-22-2008 10:54 AM


Re-numbers
Brian writes:
Take the 3 million in the Exodus group, this is an implausible amount of people to be produced from an intial 70 in 430 years,
What provokes you to disbelief?
Is it mathamatically impossible?
Is it that you just don't want to believe anything about the Bible?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Brian, posted 07-22-2008 10:54 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Brian, posted 07-23-2008 12:47 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 20 of 187 (476399)
07-23-2008 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Brian
07-23-2008 12:47 PM


Re-numbers
Brian writes:
Every singlepiece of research that has looked at this problem has concluded that this population growth for the time and place is impossible.
I did not ask about everybody's conclusions, I ask you a point blank question.
Is it mathematically impossible? Yes/No is all that is required.
That is the question.
One of your quotes mentioned:
''Such a number would have, indeed, caused Egypt's Pharaoh consternation,
I thought it did to the point he order all male children killed by the midwives.
I notice so far you have totally ignored my Message 4 which was a direct address to your questions you raised in your OP. As you and jaywill scattered a covey of quail and began trying to chase them all down.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Brian, posted 07-23-2008 12:47 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Brian, posted 07-23-2008 1:34 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 22 of 187 (476411)
07-23-2008 3:32 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Brian
07-23-2008 1:34 PM


Re-numbers
Brian writes:
Mathematically impossible: No.
That is correct because it is mathematically possible for there to have been 19 million people 26 years of age and under.
Brian writes:
So you asked two questions, and the info I provided demonstrates the impossibility of the historical accuracy of the numbers involved.
I went back and reread my post and you are correct I did ask two questions.
The information you provided demonstrates the reason you have come to the conclusion that it is impossible.
Does that mean it is impossible? Yes/No
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Brian, posted 07-23-2008 1:34 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Coragyps, posted 07-23-2008 3:49 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 24 by Brian, posted 07-23-2008 4:03 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 27 of 187 (476424)
07-23-2008 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Brian
07-23-2008 4:03 PM


Re-numbers
Brian writes:
Yes.
I will accept that you believe your answer.
I will not ask you to provide me with the facts that would back up your answer as life is too short.
But I don't want you to think I will accept your position without those facts.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Brian, posted 07-23-2008 4:03 PM Brian has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 28 of 187 (476425)
07-23-2008 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by New Cat's Eye
07-23-2008 5:19 PM


Re Nineveh
Catholic Scientist writes:
Jesus could just have easily been referring to the Jonas story while knowing that it was an allegory.
Well if he was referring to an event that never happened as an allegory.
Would that not mean that He was referring to something He was going to do but it would be nothing just like the fish story.
Either the fish story was an actual fact that Jesus was referring to or He was lying when He said He was going to be in the heart of the earth 72 hrs like Jonas and then come forth from the grave.
That puts me and presumably you down the creek without a paddle to get back upstream.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-23-2008 5:19 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Brian, posted 07-23-2008 5:49 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 31 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-23-2008 5:57 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 33 by Coragyps, posted 07-23-2008 6:23 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 34 of 187 (476436)
07-23-2008 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Coragyps
07-23-2008 6:23 PM


Re Nineveh
Coragyps writes:
Check your story's plotline, ICANT. I don't think you can get 72 hours between Friday at midday and dawn on Sunday. 42 hours, maybe....
You are confusing the RCC plot line with the facts.
Buried sometime between 3 PM and 6 PM Wednesday and resurrected at the same identical time Saturday afternoon. Exactly 72 hrs.
Maybe we can go into detail one of these days in a thread.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Coragyps, posted 07-23-2008 6:23 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Coragyps, posted 07-23-2008 9:39 PM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 36 of 187 (476443)
07-23-2008 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by New Cat's Eye
07-23-2008 5:57 PM


Re Nineveh
Catholic Scientist writes:
But that is not true, as I've just explained. He could have reference the fish story all the while knowing it didn't really happen and still not be lying.
Since you are in the explaining business please explain to me why Jesus would use a lie to portray what he was going to do.
Why did He have to use a reference?
Why use the fish story if it was false?
Why not just make the statement:
The Son of man shall be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
Instead of:
Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
There would be no confusion and as far as He was concerned it would not make any difference.
But He said He was going to be in the earth three days and three nights.
He also said as Jonas was three days and three nights in the Kh'to belly.
Kh'to transliterated ketos = Sea monster, huge fish, whale.
The word as = ‘ adverb transliterated hsper = just as, even as.
Jesus said: even as or just as Jonas was three days and three nights in the Kh'to belly.
If one was a lie they both were a lie.
That would make Jesus a liar.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-23-2008 5:57 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-24-2008 10:54 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 44 of 187 (476568)
07-24-2008 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Brian
07-24-2008 5:01 AM


Re Nineveh
Brian writes:
It was the capital, up until it was destroyed in 612 BCE. However, his title would be King of Assyria, not king of one of its cities. Elizabeth II lives in London, but she doesn't get referred to as the Queen of London.
Is she the Queen of London?
I have heard Elizabeth II referred to as the Queen of Georgetown. Which is the capital of Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.
So if Tiglath-Pilser III was king of Assyria, would he be king of Nineveh?
Brian writes:
Also, why 60 miles in the one direction, is it because you assume that 60 miles is a reasonable distance to walk in 3 days and Asshur just happens to be 60 miles away to the South of Nineveh?
Good question. I am glad you asked because I would have assumed to begin with that the city was probably spread out around the capital building's and palaces and army headquarters that was behind the walled enclosure. But I would rather it be your suggestion.
Nineveh was a very important city between the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean. On the Tigris River near the Khosr River junction. This made it a place where wealth flowed into from many sources.
It became one of the greatest of all the region's ancient cities.
Brian writes:
So, 'Jonah went out of the city', which must mean he was in the city; it is obvious what he author meant here.
Jonah 3:4 And Jonah began to enter into the city a day's journey, and he cried, and said, Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown.
Well we know he got a day's journey in before he began to deliver his message. Assuming he went another 1/2 day's journey he would have been in the heart of the city.
If he went out of the city he had to make a 1 and 1/2 day's journey to get outside the city.
Brian writes:
The text says he sat down within eyesight of the city to watch what was going to happen to it,
Jonah 4:5 So Jonah went out of the city, and sat on the east side of the city, and there made him a booth, and sat under it in the shadow, till he might see what would become of the city.
The text actually says "till he might see what would become of the city".
It does not say he sat down within eyesight of the city. But if he was at the city limits sign it is possible it was only a foot or less away.
Brian writes:
Jonah was specifically told to preach in the city.
And he did. He went at least a day's journey into the city.
Brian writes:
Nineveh was a walled city, and we are told that Jonah went into the city, and came out of it again.
And I suppose you can prove that there was nothing outside of those walls, that would be part of the city.
I live in a small city in Florida and it has 4.2 sq. miles of land in the city limits. If we walled part of it to have less than eight miles of walled city you would have to go outside the wall to get to the Walmart and Holiday Inn and several other large businesses. We have people living 10 to 15 miles from downtown. They have been talking of annexing much of that area for tax purposes.
As I pointed out in Message 4 Jacksonville, Florida has already done that.
Brian writes:
"Persons who cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand" are children.
Do you have any idea what this phrase is talking about?
'Hint' It has nothing to do with children.
I will wait for your answer before I comment.
But it would really make no difference if there was a million or more people in Nineveh. That would be a moot point as all would not have to live where the king and his army was housed.
Brian writes:
God's point about children is something like this: "Jonah, if you don't care about adults, maybe you care about children? Do you even have any compassion for them?"
That is good. Reading God's mind when you don't think it exists.
Brian writes:
They are beyond the realms of historical research.
What makes you think that?
I believe in miracles. I am one.
Brian writes:
But Jonah ran away from the LORD and headed for Tarshish. He went down to Joppa, where he found a ship bound for that port.
Jonah hated the Assyrians and wanted God to destroy them. He also knew if he went and preached they would repent and God would not destroy them. So he went the other way so God would have to destroy them.
Brian writes:
Lot of 'ifs' there bud, and no reason at all to assume that the sailors would be anywhere near Nineveh since their journey's destination just happened to be Tarshish.
You are quite right, when in Joppa they were some 500 miles down river in a vessel built for open water not a river.
Lets see if I can address a couple of those ifs.
Lets see now this boat Jonah got on in Joppa headed to Tarshish was a merchant ship carrying goods.
1:4 There was a mighty tempest in the sea.
1:5 The mariners were afraid. Every man cried to his own god. Then they cast forth the wares that were in the ship into the sea.
1:6 All this time Jonah was asleep.
1:8 Then said they unto him, Tell us, we pray thee, for whose cause this evil is upon us; What is thine occupation? and whence comest thou? what is thy country? and of what people art thou?
1:9 Jonah's answer was he was a Hebrew and served the God of heaven.
They knew who he was talking about.
1:10 1:10 Then were the men exceedingly afraid. (I wonder why)
1:12 Jonah told them to cast him in the sea.
That would solve all his problems he would not have to warn Nineveh
and God would destroy them.
1:13 The men were afraid to throw Jonah overboard and rowed hard to
bring it to land. But could not.
1:14 They asked the Lord not to blame them.
1:15 They cast Jonah in the sea. The sea ceased from her raging.
1:16 Then the men feared the LORD exceedingly, and offered a sacrifice unto the LORD, and made vows.
These guys made a sacrifice to Jonah's God.
They made vows to Jonah's God.
They could have continued their journey. But they had no cargo. The only way to get cargo was to return to Joppa and reload.
Three days later a fish deposits the man they had thrown overboard on dry land.
I don't know for sure but I think that would cause quite a stir.
Especially if they had not reloaded and left again.
Brian writes:
You can see that the 'prayer' is written in the form of a psalm.
First a psalm is written to be sung or chanted. This chapter does not fit a psalm.
Second Jonah's prayer is not recorded anywhere.
Third 2:2 through 2:10 is Jonah's telling what happened.
Brian writes:
So you are not in the slightest bit curious as to why the authors decided to call their hero Jonah?
I would assume his father Amittai gave it to him like your father/mother gave you your name.
Brian writes:
Yes, the evidence that proves that Jonah's story is fictional, plus it means that we don't make a mockery of the Bible or the people who wrote it.
I see a lot of smoke screen, twisting of God's Word, suppositions and opinions. But what evidence?
Brian writes:
No it doesn't. It only calls Him a liar if He is claiming that Jonah's adventures really happened, but he doesn't need to be a liar, He could be genuinely mistaken, or more likely using Jonah's tale as a parable.
I don't think you want to get into a discussion of parable's but I don't remember a parable Jesus used where He used a man's name. You might know one.
Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
But He said He was going to be in the earth three days and three nights.
He also said as Jonas was three days and three nights in the Kh'to belly.
Kh'to transliterated ketos = Sea monster, huge fish, whale.
The word as = ‘ adverb transliterated hosper = just as, even as.
Jesus said: even as or just as Jonas was three days and three nights in the Kh'to belly.
If the statement Jesus made concerning Jonah was anything other than a fact that would make Jesus a liar.
I have been asked many times by children, "is there a Santa Clause"?
If I say yes that is a lie because there is no Santa Clause.
The same goes for Jesus saying He would in the earth for 3 days and 3 nights ‘ just as Jonas was 3 days and 3 nights in the fish.
There is no wiggle room.
Brian writes:
Well, if you are happy to accept that Jesus was alive for three days and nights in His tomb that's up to you. It does go very much against Christian beliefs though.
Jesus was not in the tomb only the physical body He had used here on earth. But he was alive.
He met the thief that had died on the cross beside him like He said He would in paradise. He delivered the message to all the OT saints that victory was at hand. When He came forth from the grave He set those captives free and they went to the third heaven and are there praising God today.
Brian writes:
But why does this verse mean that Jonah's story has to be 100% accurate? Why couldn't Jesus use Jonah as a parable like He did with many other of His teachings?
Because it was not a parable.
Brian writes:
The Jonah tale would be well known to Jesus' audience, so it makes perfect sense for Jesus to use this story. Does there really need to be a 'Good Samaritan' for Jesus' point to be valid?
If it was well known why didn't the disciples get it.
"Does there really need to be a 'Good Samaritan'"?
There does if Jesus had given the Good Samaritan a name.
As the Good Samaritan story goes there has been thousands of them. But there has only been one Jonah.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Brian, posted 07-24-2008 5:01 AM Brian has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 45 of 187 (476570)
07-24-2008 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by New Cat's Eye
07-24-2008 10:54 AM


Re-Story
Catholic Scientist writes:
Had Jesus said: "Just as Jack and Jill went up the hill, I too will rise up to heaven"....
Did Jack and Jill physically go up a hill? No
Did Jesus physically rise up to heaven? Yes.
So it would be a lie to say: "Just as Jack and Jill went up the hill, I too will rise up to heaven".
The only way it could be like what Jack and Jill did would be if He never did it physicaly.
Is that what you are saying happened?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-24-2008 10:54 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-25-2008 9:23 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 46 of 187 (476571)
07-24-2008 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Brian
07-24-2008 5:50 AM


Re: 3 million
Brian writes:
Archaeologists have found only two sites from the Exodus itinerary that can be identified with any confidence, Kadesh-Barnea and Ezion-Geber, so you think we would find some evidence at these sites, especially at Kadesh-Barnea since the Israelites camped there for 38 years!
What would you expect to find?
They drank water from a rock.
They picked up their food every morning as it was laying on the ground.
Their clothes never wore out.
Their shoes never wore out.
Their tents did not wear out.
They had central heat for the cold nights.
They had air conditioning for the hot day.
So what are you looking for?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Brian, posted 07-24-2008 5:50 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Coragyps, posted 07-24-2008 8:51 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 59 by Brian, posted 07-25-2008 1:13 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 48 of 187 (476592)
07-25-2008 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Coragyps
07-24-2008 8:51 PM


Re: 3 million
Coragyps writes:
They never had to go potty?
You think you could find it now if they did?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Coragyps, posted 07-24-2008 8:51 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Coragyps, posted 07-25-2008 7:05 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 51 of 187 (476609)
07-25-2008 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Coragyps
07-25-2008 7:05 AM


Re:Latrines
Coragyps writes:
Very possibly, out there in the desert. The latrines they dug would already have been found.
You are assuming they dug latrines.
I wonder who manufactured their back hoes.
Maybe the Egyptians gave them one when they left Egypt.
Maybe they took a bunch of shovels with them.
But then maybe they did like we used to do on the farm. Deposited it on the top of the ground and when there was too much in one place change places. You could go back in a couple of months and there would be no trace of your waste. They did wander around for 40 years.
God has provided a way that those products that came from the earth can return to the earth. If he hadn't there would be a thriving business in Texas cleaning up behind all those cows that roam the range.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Coragyps, posted 07-25-2008 7:05 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 52 of 187 (476612)
07-25-2008 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by New Cat's Eye
07-25-2008 9:23 AM


Re: Re-Story
Catholic Scientist writes:
It would not be a lie.
Your idea of what is true and what is a lie is a lot different than mine.
There is truth.
Anything that is not truth is a lie.
Catholic Scientist writes:
No, I'm saying that Jesus referencing the fictional story of Jonas is not Jesus saying that the story actually happened in reality. The point of the reference was that, in the fictional story, Jonas was in the belly for 3 days just like Jesus was going to be dead for 3 days. That the story of Jonas was fictional doesn't make this reference any less veracious.
If it is so plain and simple to you why did the disciples and especially the apostles not understand what Jesus said?
If a child asked me if there was a Santa Clause and I said yes would I be telling a lie?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-25-2008 9:23 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-25-2008 10:24 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 54 by LinearAq, posted 07-25-2008 10:52 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 55 of 187 (476628)
07-25-2008 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by LinearAq
07-25-2008 10:52 AM


Re: Story vs Lie
LinearAg writes:
There really was a prodigal son? There really were 10 virgins with their lamp oil, five of whom didn't get the bridegroom because the others wouldn't share the extra they had been given? Lazarus and the rich man really spoke to each other across the chasm between Hades and Paradise? Paradise is really a place in Abraham's bosom?
"There really was a prodigal son?"
This was a parable relating to man's relationship to God. But as a parable many will never understand it.
There have been millions who have wasted their substance in riotous living in the pig pens of this world. The Father accepts everyone who is willing to return home. Not one has been rejected.
"There really were 10 virgins with their lamp oil, five of whom didn't get the bridegroom because the others wouldn't share the extra they had been given?"
This parable is talking about the kingdom of heaven. And yes there will be saved people who will not be a part of the bride of the Bridegroom.
This was a parable explaining the mysteries of heaven. Many will never understand it.
"Lazarus and the rich man really spoke to each other across the chasm between Hades and Paradise?"
This was not a parable as Jesus never used a person's name in a Parable. It was fact or lie.
" Paradise is really a place in Abraham's bosom?"
Wrong, Paradise was really a place where the spirits of the OT saints was preserved in the covenant God made with Abraham.
When Jesus was resurrected Paradise was no more as the promise was fulfilled. He set the captives free and they are in the presence of God today.
So what is the problem? Oh I see:
LinearAq writes:
Following your requirement regarding Jesus' reference to Jonah, each of the parables has to be historically accurate. Otherwise, Jesus is a liar.
You are saying the Jonas story was a parable.
It was not a parable. It was fact or lie.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by LinearAq, posted 07-25-2008 10:52 AM LinearAq has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024