|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Junior Member (Idle past 6058 days) Posts: 21 From: Brownsburg, Indiana, USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Old Laws Still Valid? | |||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
scottness writes: 37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? Do you notice it is the righteous who are the one's who do not acknowledge their own works for any value in saving them? No. The righteous did not realize that they would be judged by their works alone. It was Jesus who told them that they were righteous because of their works alone.
44Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Yet here, those on his left appeal to the good works they have done and are shocked. Again, no. The unrighteous on His left thought they could be saved by paying lip-service to loving Him. He told them that the only way to love Him is by loving our fellow man.
45Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. In otherwords, if our works are going to save us, they must be flawless. Right down to the smallest letter, and least stroke of the pen. No. (Third strike.) Whatever we do to the least of His brethern, we do to Him (verse 40). Technically, one good deed could be enough to number you among the sheep. It isn't one strike and you're out. It's one run can win the game. Loving thy neighbour as thyself is the fulfilment of the law. Jesus came to explain that and to be an example of that. The old letter of the law - e.g. eating shrimp, etc. - is invalid because it is not about loving thy neighbour. The old spirit of the law is still valid. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: Since the forum topic is Bible study, nowhere does the Bible declare salvation is granted freely to everyone. It is granted to those who follow the prescription God gives in John 3:16. "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life." Read a little further:
quote: It's all in the doing, not in the empty platitudes. It's not enough to claim that you "believe". You have to demonstrate that you believe in Him by doing what He told you to do - that is, to uphold the spirit of the law instead of the letter of the law. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
anastasia writes: It's not enough to claim that you "believe". You have to demonstrate that you believe in Him by doing what He told you to do - that is, to uphold the spirit of the law instead of the letter of the law. Or what? You go to hell? Read what He said:
quote: It seems pretty clear how one might get to hell. But, as I tried to explain to Rob, it might only take one good deed to get you to heaven. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
scottness writes: ... Jesus did away with the idea that adultery is a material act alone. The breaking of the law is in the heart, but the keeping of the law is by material acts. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
scottness writes: ... it only takes one sin to go to hell. Jesus disagrees with you. The quotes have been posted often enough.
When talking about the Law, we're talking about utter HOLINESS. Nonsense. Holiness isn't even mentioned in the law. When talking about the Law, we're talking about getting along with each other. Love God and love thy neighbour as thyself. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
scottness writes: When talking about the Law, we're talking about getting along with each other. Love God and love thy neighbour as thyself. You don't think those things are Holy? Holy? Let's take it slowly. Here's what Jesus said about the law:
quote: Notice the word "as". Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. "As" is a comparison. Jesus told us to love our neighbours relative to the way we love ourselves. According to Jesus, the law is relative. If you buy yourself a new plasma TV, you should think about buying one for your neighbour too. (Or at the very least, invite him to watch the Super Bowl on yours.) On the other hand, if you haven't eaten in three days, you don't need to feel obligated to feed the poor. It's all relative. It's all in comparison to what you do for yourself. So "perfection" is irrelevant. You don't treat yourself perfectly, so you aren't expected to treat your neighbours perfectly either. When the Bible speaks about perfection, it's as an ideal to be aimed for. It is not a minimum standard to be punished if you don't attain it. Now, remember how Jesus told us to obey the law:
quote: We love God by loving our neighbour, by feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the prisoner. We love God by doing. We obey the law by doing. It is the doing of the law that is holy, not the letter of the law itself. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
scottness writes: So who should I believe? You? Or the Apostle paul? Frankly, I couldn't care less what you believe. I'm just trying to expose some of your most egregious errors so that people who are capable of reason can make up their own minds. I have quoted what Jesus said. If you choose to reject Jesus in favour of a misinterpreation of Paul, that's your lookout.
Do you think this means that if I love myself by indulging in the pleasures of life, that I fulfill the law by sharing those indulgences with others? Is that what you're suggesting? Yes.
So Ringo, as Jesus said, 'Do this, and you will live.' If you think you can do that, then you're a better man than I. Don't be so hard on yourself. Doing something is the easiest thing in the world. Deciding what to do is not always easy, since morality is so relative. Sometimes you will screw up and sometimes you won't. But the only wrong approach is to sit in your ivory tower and do nothing.
I don't even deserve to be in your presence! I agree, but I'm not an admin.
That's the whole message I'm afraid... that reality is perfect.... If you think that's the "whole" message, or any part of the message, you have good reason to be afraid. Reality is far from perfect.
... if you want an excuse to live whatever lifestyle that suits you, then the Bible is not your friend. That's the opposite of what I've been saying. I've been saying that we have to live whatever lifestyle suits our neighbour as well as ourselves. And I was quoting Jesus when I said it. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
scottness writes: If logic is valid (if reason is valid), reality cannot be other than perfect, just the way it is. Silly. And off-topic.
You were created to walk in the Law. But no one can do that without the One Spirit that knows the way to guide them because He is the law. I quoted what He said about the law. Respond to that. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon 10:10 writes: ... one has been judged already because he chose not to believe in the only begotten Son of God But what does it mean to "believe" in Him? Surely believing that He existed is trivial. Surely believing that He wandered around the Middle East performing miracles is trivial. Surely believing that He was crucified, died and rose on the third day is trivial. Surely believing in Him means believing in the message He brought. With reference to the law, His message was:
quote: Believing in Him means loving God by loving your neighbour as yourself. All other professions of belief are worthless in the eyes of the law. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: "But as many as received Him (the Lord Jesus), to them He gave the right to become children of God...." But what does it mean to "receive" Him, if not to receive the message that He brought?
Those that are born of God are "born again".... But what does it mean to be "born again", if not to start over, to make a new beginning, a new life as He told us to live?
... one cannot understand the message, let alone obey the message. But the message is very simple: Love God and love thy neighbour as thyself. The living of the message isn't always easy, but the understanding of it is very simple. You're ignoring what Jesus Himself said about the law: The letter of the law, such as "Thou shalt not eat shrimp," is not valid unless it effects your neighbour. Today, for example, the law might be, "Thou shalt not send peanut butter to school in thy children's lunches," because your child's lunch might kill your neighbour's child. It's all relative. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
jaywill writes: I have received Him. Then you must have received His message. You must be adept at loving your neighbour as yourself - for example, not snubbing him when he talks to you. You must understand that that is the fulfillment of the law. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: Those who concentrate only on the message without first entering into the new covenant "born again" relationship with Jesus have missed the saving Gospel of Christ. But the message is how to live that new life. And that's the topic here. Jesus said, "This is what I want you to do: Love God and love your neighbour as yourself." That is the law. That is the message. If you don't live that message, you have not "received" Jesus and you have not been "born again". Unless the law becomes your life, all your woo-woo mumbo-jumbo voodoo protestations about "salvation" are meaningless. And that is what you have not addressed: the law is significant only in how it effects our lives. The law that applied in the wilderness is obsolete. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: The message Jesus gives is that you can't truly live the message until you are first "born again".... Once again, this is Bible Study, not your personal blog for your personal, unfounded opinions. I have quoted the Bible, where Jesus tells us to love our neighbours as ourselves. Anybody can do that whether or not they've been hosed down by the "blood of the Lamb". Muslims do it. Hindus do it. Atheists do it. Even some Christians do it, if they're not too blinded by rhetoric. You don't need anything you don't already have. By kindergarten, you were able to love your neighbour as yourself. Put the parrot back in his cage and quote the Bible to back up your ideas. Show us where it says you can't love your neighbour as yourself. Hint: Think of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30-37). Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: When one studies the Bible - God's love letter to man, one studies the SUM of God's truth, not just a few verses that suit your personal opinions. The trouble is that you haven't given any scripture - sum, difference, product or quotient - to back up your own empty opinions. We are discussing the law here. Jesus said that the whole law hangs on loving God and loving your neighbour as yourself. The SUM of that truth is that no law is valid unless it effects your neighbour. Your opinions about being "born again" are utterly irrelevant. That's why I brought up the Good Samaritan. When Jesus was asked, "Who is my neighbour?", He replied with the parable of the Good Smaritan. The Samaritan was not a Christian by your definition, was not "born again" by your definition, he did "reject the blood of Jesus", his sins were not "covered".... He was everything you look down on, just as he was everything the Jews looked down on. Yet he was the one that Jesus used as an example of what we should do. "Go ye and do likewise." The fact that he was not a Christian was irrelevant. The fact that he was not "born again" was irrelevant. The fact that he "rejected the blood of Jesus" was irrelevant. The fact that his sins weren't "covered" was irrelevant. The only relevant factor in the story was what he did. He did what Jesus wanted him to do - what Jesus wants us to do. He fulfilled the law by doing unto others as he would have wanted them to do unto him. The story illustrates very clearly that the law is relevant only in how we apply it to our fellow man. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
John 10:10 writes: If my “opinions” about being “born again” are irrelevant, so also are the words of Jesus in John 3:3-7. Your opinions about being "born again" are certainly irrelevant in this thread, since it's about the law. Kindly say something about the topic for once, will ya?
I’ll take His words over yours any day. But I've been quoting Jesus' words and you've been ignoring them. Jesus used the example of the Good Samaritan. The Samaritan was not "born again", yet Jesus told us what he did and He told us to go and do likewise. Born again or not, the Samaritan is our example. So, forget your dogma for a minute and think about the topic. What was the importance of the Samaritan's example? What did he do that Jesus encourages us to do? How does that relate to the notion of iron-clad Old Testament laws? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024