Did you not read my post above?
The Miller-Urey Experiment is evidence of ABIOGENISIS. Abiogenisis is the study of the possible origins of life thrugh non-organic chemical processes. It's more chemestry than Biology and it has nothing, I reapeat NOTHING to do with evolution.
So, if anyone brings it fourth as proof of anything other than ABIOGENISIS, they are in the wrong. Do you understand?
The Miller-Urey experiment is Abiogenisis NOT Evolution.
If you could repeat the sentece above three (3) times followd by the statement:
"I understand the meaning of the above words."
We will know that you got it. Ok?
Peace.