Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Babel: The Mother Culture?
Origen
Member (Idle past 6322 days)
Posts: 52
Joined: 12-29-2006


Message 106 of 115 (372873)
12-29-2006 10:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Ophir
11-20-2006 4:20 PM


This is not a science topic as much as it is a history lesson. The reason why God mixed the languages was for the reason that mankind need to disperse and spread out through the world. What happened is a man called Nimrod attempted to bring the whole population of the world at that time together and unite them in idolatry. Well, this is evil to God and God would not allow man to have that kind of control over other people. That kind of control will happen in the end, when the AntiChrist attempts to unite the world against God. Nimrod is Babylon 1, while the AntiChrist follows after Nimrod's Babylon. What happened at Babel is a fact and well supportted in history andn archaeology.
God came and confused the language of the people in Shinar (or, "Sumer") at the time, these people began ton freak out because they could no longer speak the common language anymore. Hence the language tree was born.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Ophir, posted 11-20-2006 4:20 PM Ophir has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by AdminPhat, posted 12-29-2006 10:49 PM Origen has replied
 Message 109 by ReverendDG, posted 12-29-2006 11:52 PM Origen has replied
 Message 111 by iceage, posted 12-30-2006 12:16 AM Origen has not replied

  
Origen
Member (Idle past 6322 days)
Posts: 52
Joined: 12-29-2006


Message 112 of 115 (372904)
12-30-2006 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by ReverendDG
12-29-2006 11:52 PM


That is false. Southern Babylon was Sumer and northern Babylon was Akkad. I know thias because I am an ancient historian who owns several ancient manuscripts. Shinar does not mean north in Hebrew, and if it did mean North in Hebrew it could not mean south at the same time--law of non-contradiction. Shinar is an indirect Hebrew reference to southern Babylon and every true Biblical scholar knows this. I will not argue with an argumentive person if you are looking to be argumentive. We Christians know our faith better than all evolutionists in this world and you're going to have to accept that. Besides, the forum mod said I cannot post information in defense of true knowable history on this forum and for that vague set of rules alone I am leaving this forum because its run by the priori commitment of closed mindedness. The rules here remain me alot like the Constitution of the USSR --easy to manipulate!! I was hoping this forum was professional but its not, so I'll just stick to the forum I've been on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by ReverendDG, posted 12-29-2006 11:52 PM ReverendDG has not replied

  
Origen
Member (Idle past 6322 days)
Posts: 52
Joined: 12-29-2006


Message 113 of 115 (372914)
12-30-2006 1:22 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by AdminPhat
12-29-2006 10:49 PM


Re: Origen
I guess there nothing more offensive then an evolutionists who 'pretends' to be a Biblical scholar and open topics that bash the Authority if the Bible and not allow real Biblical theologians to respond to all the factions given by those who have never studied the Bible or other histories without the use of modern Marxist commentaries designed to manipulate knowable truth under the guise of propaganda. We Christians know a great deal about Babylon and have 2000-years of study over evolutions 150-years. Even before the Christian area the Jews knew their history of Babylon better than those bigot pseudohistorians of the last 150-years!
I have studied true knowable history and archaeology and have found out that evolutionists do next to nothing about this ancient people. All evos have is what Wellhausen and Aleister Crolwey wrote for them which is not a reliable source of information. Evos also fail to deny all of Wellhausen's work after it was refuted by the Ebla Tablets: A monotheistic creation account that antedates the Enuma Elish and was written from the same line of people (Eber, Gen.10:25) and the same part of the world that the Hebrews came from before their slavery in Egypt! So Wellhausen knew nothing about ancient history and must be denied by all historians and archaeologists as someone of authority. And if you atheists actually saw for your own eyes the historical confirmation of the Babel calamity you'd serious have to question evolution afterward. But...facts probably mean nothing when presumptions make more MONEY!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by AdminPhat, posted 12-29-2006 10:49 PM AdminPhat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by AdminPhat, posted 12-30-2006 3:00 AM Origen has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024