Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homosexuality and the bible yet again
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6054 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 17 of 23 (157485)
11-08-2004 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by dpardo
11-08-2004 8:20 PM


Hi dpardo,
You emphasized, "for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature."
Could this meaning anything other than lesbianism? For example, if one considers the "natural use" of women to bear and raise children, perhaps not doing so (by choice or biology) would be considered "against nature"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by dpardo, posted 11-08-2004 8:20 PM dpardo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by arachnophilia, posted 11-08-2004 11:14 PM pink sasquatch has replied

pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6054 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 20 of 23 (157490)
11-08-2004 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by arachnophilia
11-08-2004 11:14 PM


personally, i think paul means that they were holding positions in society contrary to paul's ideology.
This would be my interpretation as well.
God was quite explicit in Leviticus' "man shall not lie with man as with woman"; I don't see why, if He was speaking through Paul, He would be so ambiguous in Romans.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by arachnophilia, posted 11-08-2004 11:14 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by arachnophilia, posted 11-08-2004 11:31 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024