Buzsaw, as personal belief, there is nothing wrong with your viewpoint. However, isn't it contradictory to use the term day to mean two differnt things in Genesis 1, even though there is no reason to do so other than personal interpretation? It seems to indicate that your viewpoint isn't truly "literal", and that you have no problem at least intreprating some of the of the bible to match other personal viewpoints.
Mike pretty well covered my reasons for my statements. Thanks Mike. It takes me a while to get back to responses as I'm a busy fellow. You see Darwin, all the text uses to describe "days" were evenings and mornings. The earth was, according to Genesis created before the sun and an undetermined number of stars. The Holy Spirit was doing the working according to Genesis one and Psalms 104:30. It is my believe that the all powerful Holy Spirit was the light of it while present working. Nothing was in place to light the earth or to determine the length of the evenings and mornings until sometime in day four when the creation of the sun, moon and "stars" were put in place. Even the plant life preceeded the sun. So how can we say emphatically that the first four days were 24 hour days?
And to say the universe is only 6000 years old is just plain unthinkable. That would have the eternal God, creator of the universe, who claims to be the same yesterday, today and forever out in space all by himself with nothing around him and nothing to do for all eternity preceeding a mere 6000 years ago. I must say, I don't blame the critics for rolling their eyes at that notion.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz