I've noticed something about you. You are fond of stating what you think other people think: Nuggin is ignorant about ID (even when he gave several first rate evidences of ID being repackaged creationism) and all women are insecure and lie about settling for men they end up with.
I think that you think that you know the real reasons people say, do and think the things they do. You also believe this with a high degree of certainty and this prevents you from actually taking on board what they may be trying to communicate to you.
Typical authoritarian conservative xian.
How does it feel?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
™ Version 4.2
