I think you are correct that it is just a story. Trouble is that there are many here who don't think that. to them it is literal history.
Sure. My whole point through was in regards to the OP which is dismissive of God based on acceptance of this mythology. Therefore it seems a bit extreme to discount God due to some section of the populations rigid definition of Him.
Again the claim here is that God is omnipotent and omniscient. Any such God HAS to know the choice they would make since that lack of knowledge would lessen him. He is either all powerful and all knowing or he isn't.
Well I can't seem to find that claim in the OP. Certainly if you DEFINE God as omnipotent the conclusion is warranted but if that conclusion is ABOUT God then it seems very much like begging the question.
"Well, if God is omnipotent then he is a big jerk for letting bad things happen."
"Mabye God is not omnipotent."
No smoking signs by gas stations. No religion in the public square. The government should keep us from being engulfed in flames on earth, and that is pretty much it. -- Jon Stewart, The Daily Show