The fundamental error in your argument is the assumption that evolution and creation are simply chosen without regaerd to the truth of the propositions.
In reality evolution is a scientific conclusion which is massivlet supported by the evidence. Creation is a religious dogma.
If God exists, and has been active in the history of life then the evidence we find should reflect His activity - since it incldues the results of that activity. And that evidence points to evolution, not creation. Creation, then, is a human-created doctrine which seeks to dictate to God what he did do.
Thus your final paragraph should be reworded:
In conclusion, I would say that it all comes down to how we decide what principle to eat from. what tree to eat from, the tree of evolution, and humble yourself to God. But[sic] the tree of creation, and become our own god.