There are not sides. Did I say there are no sides? Well like yom" means a 24 hour day to K. Ham there are no c/e sides!! Mark24 and I probably dont agree but he doesn't quote my "illusion//" below the fold for no reason.
Now I will say generally why I SAY this is so. I will make the announcement as fact but the statement may be false. It is a sentence nonetheless.
Cell death is a means to reset the "vector' attributes of a central RNA 'clock" (via U) embedded in a tensor surround of immune adapted tensors in some cases. Operon silmutaneity remands this be false if regulation in some cases is acheived by stalling and frequency changes in rate of non-uniform transit across any old attenuator. There are no sides. There is a clock. Different lengths of endonucleolytic DNA not mutually exclusive segement divisions "FORCE" these changes.
Now I will addresss Ned on Newto'n' for the EPR paradox and Bohr's instistence of where there is "room" for new physical laws is only sidelined in this possibility. I think that is impossible for the reason that I think we attempt to find statistics where linear numbers instead are called for. The psychology of 5-D space and baraminology may not be a cross purposes. But there must be some purpose.
Did I say there are no sides? There is failure to heed transcendentalism for probalism but this is NOT what Gould meant by "smoothing the Galton polyhedron". There there ARE sides and a worm ring is not a ringworm.
™ Version 4.2