Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is macroevolution a religion? Should we rename it evolutiontarianism?
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 112 (90371)
03-04-2004 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by kendemyer
03-04-2004 7:06 PM


Re: TO: schrafinator
You made an error in your post.
I would say that it is a multidisciplinary effort of many scientist plus the involvement of educators, judges, politicians, etc who attempt to avoid unsubstantiated fairy tales and create a environment that fosters intellectual growth and the spirit of inquiry.
There. I fixed it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by kendemyer, posted 03-04-2004 7:06 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 112 (90419)
03-04-2004 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by kendemyer
03-04-2004 10:41 PM


Stalin, a dedicated Darwinist?
quote:
Now since Darwin was no possessor of a biology degree but had a theology degree like Stalin was working toward or completed, I would say that Stalin is the biologist you are looking for.
Did you learn logic like this in your managerial training?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by kendemyer, posted 03-04-2004 10:41 PM kendemyer has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by PaulK, posted 03-05-2004 3:31 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 112 (90538)
03-05-2004 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 1:25 PM


Re: TO: proponents of macroevolutionary hypothesis
Another good example is the contemporary U.S. Nothing is more materialistic than good old fashioned free market economics - as espoused by, of all people, the relgious right. I directly blame the chaos and social problems in this country, as opposed to other Western nations, to the dominance that the political right has enjoyed in this country.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 1:25 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 112 (90576)
03-05-2004 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 2:49 PM


Re: Pasteur
kendemyer,
the quotations you use seem to show that Pasteur believed in a Creator, but they don't indicate whether he believed that the Creator created in the manner depicted in Genesis. I think most theistic evolutionists would make the quotes themselves.
Also, this doesn't address the topic of the thread, which is the "Taliban-like" academia censoring the poor creationists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 2:49 PM kendemyer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 3:14 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 112 (90585)
03-05-2004 3:26 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 3:14 PM


Re: Pasteur
Interesting. But what does this have to do with the topic of this thread?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 3:14 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 112 (90600)
03-05-2004 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 3:39 PM


Re: church of darwin
Mindless propaganda.
Kendemyer, do you wish to actually engage in discussion, or just post links to essays that you don't quite understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 3:39 PM kendemyer has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-05-2004 3:46 PM Chiroptera has not replied
 Message 39 by Trixie, posted 03-05-2004 3:48 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 112 (90630)
03-05-2004 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by MisterOpus1
03-05-2004 4:31 PM


Re: remember the materialist mantra
kendemyer doesn't seem to know what he is arguing about or against. I haven't read a post of his yet where he has succeeded in putting together a coherent thought.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-05-2004 4:31 PM MisterOpus1 has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 112 (90632)
03-05-2004 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 4:36 PM


to kendemyer
kendemyer,
No one knows how the universe began. So what?
No one yet has a complete picture as to how life began. So what?
We do have ample evidence that the earth has a long history, and that present species have evolved from earlier species, regardless where the very first life came from. Do you want to argue about evidence, or do you want to link to some more websites?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 4:36 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 112 (90657)
03-05-2004 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 5:25 PM


focus, ken, focus
And document your claim:
quote:
It seems to me though that the macroevolutionist are the academic equivalent of the Taliban....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 5:25 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 112 (90678)
03-05-2004 6:42 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 6:35 PM


keep going, kendemeyer
Who's running from the abiogenesis issue? We all said we don't know how the first life developed. So what? Do you now want to talk about your claim about macroevolution being a religion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 6:35 PM kendemyer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 7:08 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 112 (90684)
03-05-2004 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by kendemyer
03-05-2004 7:08 PM


Re: keep going, kendemyer
Kendemeyer, are you arguing against evolution, or against materialist philosophy? Considering that there are many Christians who accept evolution, the two are not the same.
Edited to add:
Anyway, the huge amount of evidence for evolution of life over three and half billion years is plenty good foundation for the theory of evolution. The foundation of any science is the evidence in favor of it, not on any idea of origins. I don't need to know how life originated in order to be certain that life has evolved over the past few billion years; the history after the origin event is pretty well attested, especially during the last half billion years or so.
Edited again to add:
And you are one to talk about firm foundations, seeing how much faith you have in a religious text with very little scientific or archaeological evidence to back it up.
[This message has been edited by Chiroptera, 03-05-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by kendemyer, posted 03-05-2004 7:08 PM kendemyer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by kendemyer, posted 03-06-2004 11:40 AM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 112 (90819)
03-06-2004 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by kendemyer
03-06-2004 11:40 AM


I'm still waiting for evidence....
In what way is evolution a pseudoscience? Is there some inconsistency to it? Is there a whole set of phenomena that it does not explain (but should)? Is there an entire set of data that contradict it? Is it so malleable that it can explain any sort of data? Please try to present one or more concrete examples and explain how the example shows that evolution is a pseudoscience.
You may post a link to a website, of course, but please pick some example from it that supports your position and explain it in your own words.
By the way, the beginning topic of this thread is that evolution is a religion headed by a Taliban. Is religion the same as pseudoscience? Are you changing your views?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by kendemyer, posted 03-06-2004 11:40 AM kendemyer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by kendemyer, posted 03-06-2004 1:52 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 112 (90860)
03-06-2004 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by kendemyer
03-06-2004 1:52 PM


Re: I'm still waiting for evidence....
Okay, I have made an attempt to answer that post on the proper thread.
This thread is supposed to be about evolution being a Taliban-like religion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by kendemyer, posted 03-06-2004 1:52 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 112 (90944)
03-07-2004 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by kendemyer
03-01-2004 3:01 PM


evolutionary Taliban
Kendemeyer,
Your claim is that evolution is a Taliban-like religion.
Have the Talibanic evolutionaries ever busted into your home and dragged you or a family member into prison? Have you or a family member or a friend ever lost your job because of your religious beliefs? I am still waiting for you to explain your position.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by kendemyer, posted 03-01-2004 3:01 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 112 (90948)
03-07-2004 2:10 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by kendemyer
03-07-2004 2:03 PM


the battle of the links

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by kendemyer, posted 03-07-2004 2:03 PM kendemyer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by kendemyer, posted 03-07-2004 2:19 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024