Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bush wants Mars
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 22 of 45 (78901)
01-16-2004 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Silent H
01-16-2004 12:56 PM


Re: Never mind Moon Base Alpha
Well, I was trying to stop at message 1000, but her comes 1001 (I think).
quote:
Shoot, you discovered my agenda. Anyone want to guess if Cheney was busy buying up property before Bush made his announcement?
It really wouldn't surprise me, if Halliburton somehow had it's fingers in the space program (Kellog, Brown, and Root?). And I must wonder about what the corporate overlap would be, between those profitting via the gulf war pork barrel trough, and the Space exploration trough.
I think we got better things to spend our resources on, than expensive dubious cost to benefit projects that are working the fringes of science. Be it the space station (seemingly designed by Rube Goldberg) or the killed super-collider project.
Sun Ra said "Space is the place". Sun Ra also claimed to have been born on Saturn, and to have written over a billion tunes.
Moose
ps: note I recently put up a new political commentary avatar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Silent H, posted 01-16-2004 12:56 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Silent H, posted 01-16-2004 3:48 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 32 of 45 (79354)
01-19-2004 1:49 AM


Reduced to eliminated support for the Hubble telescope
I heard on the TV news the other night, that the new space initiative would mean less support for the Hubble telescope project. They seem to think that it's time to let it crash and burn.
Might you not be getting a lot more "bang for your buck", out of the Hubble, vs sending men to Mars?
Basicly, I can't help but be suspicious of anything the Bush adminstration is for (and be for anything they are against?).
Moose

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by crashfrog, posted 01-19-2004 2:12 AM Minnemooseus has not replied
 Message 34 by Silent H, posted 01-19-2004 11:37 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024