Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bush wants Mars
ThingsChange
Member (Idle past 5957 days)
Posts: 315
From: Houston, Tejas (Mexican Colony)
Joined: 02-04-2004


Message 37 of 45 (84142)
02-07-2004 2:58 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by MisterOpus1
01-19-2004 3:51 PM


Next theory ... Great Flood water from Mars
In reference to the whole thread here, and not to anyone one person:
I thought shallow thinking was from pseudo-science, but I see that pseudo-logic also applies to political discussions.
Now, for a prediction of the next big idea from Creationists:
The water from the Great Flood came from Mars.
After all, how else will scientists explain the disappearance? Under the "deep" of Mars?
The water came to Earth and flooded the Earth, and pushed the ocean depths deeper, which made the continents rise and mountains form.
Excuse me, while I start my book on the topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by MisterOpus1, posted 01-19-2004 3:51 PM MisterOpus1 has not replied

  
ThingsChange
Member (Idle past 5957 days)
Posts: 315
From: Houston, Tejas (Mexican Colony)
Joined: 02-04-2004


Message 39 of 45 (84146)
02-07-2004 3:17 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by MisterOpus1
01-19-2004 3:51 PM


What if sediments are found on Mars?
To all you Bush-bashers who think the mission to Mars is to scrap the Hubble because it promotes old universe evidence:
1. The Hubble has been providing a decade's worth of the evidence you claim the President wants to stop. It's a little late to claim that motivation. Get real.
2. I don't think the Creationists are promoting a trip to Mars, because the risk is even higher of finding more evidence of an old universe. For example, what will be the explanation of sediments if they are found on Mars? A Great Flood there, too?
3. NASA people themselves wanted a new vision. The Shuttle is out of date, and the new restrictions for safety make it even more obsolete. The Space Station was mainly for international cooperation, but the maintenance costs are climbing and the benefits are harder to justify.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by MisterOpus1, posted 01-19-2004 3:51 PM MisterOpus1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by crashfrog, posted 02-07-2004 3:27 AM ThingsChange has replied

  
ThingsChange
Member (Idle past 5957 days)
Posts: 315
From: Houston, Tejas (Mexican Colony)
Joined: 02-04-2004


Message 41 of 45 (84219)
02-07-2004 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by crashfrog
02-07-2004 3:27 AM


Spending
CrashFrog writes:
..."humor." Do they have that where you are?
Somehow, based on your previous posts, I thought you were serious. Now, I see that you have a component of condescending humor.
You say you don't understand how Bush can spend so much. It's is called staying within past-proven economically-ok percent of GNP. No need to panic, yet.
The Iraq situation is part of a grander plan. A risk worth taking, in my opinion, since status quo only seemed to breed more terrorists. The plan for freeing and rebuilding Iraq is called punish the terrorist states and reward the ones that do not support terrorists. Libya got the message.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by crashfrog, posted 02-07-2004 3:27 AM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Silent H, posted 02-07-2004 12:14 PM ThingsChange has replied

  
ThingsChange
Member (Idle past 5957 days)
Posts: 315
From: Houston, Tejas (Mexican Colony)
Joined: 02-04-2004


Message 43 of 45 (84378)
02-07-2004 9:54 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Silent H
02-07-2004 12:14 PM


If you want to make your point, go elsewhere
holmes writes:
You are wrong. But if you want to make your point on this subject, please open another thread to discuss it there.
I am personally for... (then he/she makes his/her points)"
Hey, CrashFrog, now that's funny!
You guys can have the last word, so I can get back to Evo vs Cre.
Now I am thinking that maybe I should support the Creationists.
A secular society has me worried about America.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Silent H, posted 02-07-2004 12:14 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Silent H, posted 02-07-2004 10:46 PM ThingsChange has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024