So, what you're saying is that you want to debate science without having to meet the standards of science?
I'm saying I want to discuss and debate science on the basis of an eternal universe with boundless space and on similar basis of scientists, engineers and other intelligent folk who do not interpret science on BB theory without harassment and threats of suspension.
Why on Earth should anyone be expected to oblige you? If you want to debate ID like it's science, then you need to win that debate first. But you keep losing that debate, so you don't get to talk about ID like it's science. That's what it means to lose a debate. It means people are unwilling to accept your position as a legitimate basis to build other arguments on.
The great debate, for example, was not about whether my hypothesis could be verified, but on whether it violated td laws. Jar, my great debate opponent failed to refute that.
In Jehovah God's Universe; time, energy and boundless space had no beginning and will have no ending. The universe, by and through him, is, has always been and forever will be intelligently designed, changed and managed by his providence. buzsaw
™ Version 4.2