quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"TC, creation science is by definition religious. It has several a priori religious/supernatural assumptions that must be accepted for creation science to exist in the first place:"
--What definition might that be? Because according to how mine works, it has nothing at all to do with religion or faith.
You might want to have a little think about the above.
'Creation Science' is what it is called.
Show me ONE theory/suggestion/hypothesis which is considered to
fall within Creation Science that does not, as its root postulate,
have a story from the bible.
e.g. The suggestion that the geologic column and fossil record
were laid down by the Great Flood only exists because the bible
says there WAS a great flood. The idea is rooted in the bible,
and thereby in religion.
If you still disagree that creation science is inherently
religous, please provide a definition of creation science
so that we know what you are talking about.
™ Version 4.2
