Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   International opinions: USA on science!
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 12 of 132 (329278)
07-06-2006 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Hauk
07-06-2006 7:04 AM


Re: Americans
We all know that the majority of your population still have the ability to steer away from this nonsence.
What do you know that we don't?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Hauk, posted 07-06-2006 7:04 AM Hauk has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 27 of 132 (329590)
07-07-2006 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by Hauk
07-07-2006 10:21 AM


Re: The worst thing on planet earth
Come to think of it, many scientists say the "debate" about ID should not waste intellectual resources, it should rather be ignored. After gettin emotional on the issue myselfe, I see their point.
To understand why the threat from the IDists and Biblical Creationists cannot be ignored here in the US, you need some understanding of our education system.
First, please understand that there is NO National Curriculum or set of standards for education in the US.
Second, teachers work for the local school district. IIRC in the county I live in there are eighteen different school boards. Each of these school boards is elected from the general populus of their area. Again, there are no standards or training needed to be on a school board, the position doesn't pay enough to even cover the costs involved, and they can and do set policy.
Third, Science is more than just the body of information and technology it generates. It is a method of approaching life that requires learning and practice, like any other skill set. It requires learning and applying critical thinking skills. More than anything else it requires and understanding and appreciation of uncertainty.
Fourth, recent studies seem to indicate that the decision to gather those skill sets needs to be made by about the 8th. Grade or it just doesn't happen. That means that it is those very years that are directly under the control of those school boards that will determine whether or not kids get the basics that will allow them to later go into science or as citizens to understand science.
Fifth, many of the Biblical Creationists (See article on Southern Baptists) and IDists are very serious about ether pulling the kids out of the public school systems or of getting on those school boards to control the content and direction of kid's education.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Hauk, posted 07-07-2006 10:21 AM Hauk has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 34 of 132 (329860)
07-08-2006 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Hyroglyphx
07-08-2006 11:49 AM


You gotta stop misrepresenting the issues.
nemesis_juggernaut, you continue to keep asserting that there is some connection between the TOE and atheism or some desire to write GOD out of the scenario when that is simply not true. There are many supporters of both the TOE and old earth that are every bit as religious as you, Christians, who believe that the Bible shoud be authoritive in matters of faith and belief. They also oppose the teaching of ID and most certainly, Biblical Creationism.
You need to stop asserting things that are not only untrue, but that you have been shown are untrue. If you will look here you will find a list of over 10,000 US Christian Clergy who accept the TOE and oppose the teaching of ID or Biblical Creationism.
In the words of the Clergy Project:
We the undersigned, Christian clergy from many different traditions, believe that the timeless truths of the Bible and the discoveries of modern science may comfortably coexist. We believe that the theory of evolution is a foundational scientific truth, one that has stood up to rigorous scrutiny and upon which much of human knowledge and achievement rests. To reject this truth or to treat it as “one theory among others” is to deliberately embrace scientific ignorance and transmit such ignorance to our children. We believe that among God’s good gifts are human minds capable of critical thought and that the failure to fully employ this gift is a rejection of the will of our Creator. To argue that God’s loving plan of salvation for humanity precludes the full employment of the God-given faculty of reason is to attempt to limit God, an act of hubris. We urge school board members to preserve the integrity of the science curriculum by affirming the teaching of the theory of evolution as a core component of human knowledge. We ask that science remain science and that religion remain religion, two very different, but complementary, forms of truth.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-08-2006 11:49 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-08-2006 12:56 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 38 of 132 (329872)
07-08-2006 1:28 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Hyroglyphx
07-08-2006 12:56 PM


Re: You gotta stop misrepresenting the issues.
I just scrolled through the list of suporters. Virtually all of them were the typical 3 offenders (Methodist, Lutheran, and Episcopal). Again, that means nothing to me.
That's fine, you are free to believe any fiction you want.
The difference is that I supplied a list of over 10,000 Christian Clergy that accept the TOE and oppose the teaching of Biblical Creationism and its clone, ID, you provided nothing but your own argument from incredulity.
You also quoted from some Humanist Manifesto. That's fine but it has nothing to do with whether or not Christians support the TOE.
The facts are that I provided evidence, you only assertion. In addition, you made absolutely silly claims, for example:
I also feel that you continue to misrepresent Christianity by tying together Catholicism. To you, (and this is understandable), you think Christians and Catholics are the same thing. They aren't.
Please provide evidence that Roman Catholics are not Christians or stop making misrepresentations.
After the failure of the Miller-Urey experiments and the continued failure of any kind abiogenesis event taking place, this was the one bone that athiests threw towards theists, because the First Cause is still as unexplanable now as it was then.
Please show that the Miller-Urey experiment failed or stop making misrepresentations.
For instance, by and large, the Methodist church is as liberal and leftist as a NARAL or a NAMbLA rally.
Please provide the support for that assertion or stop using it.
Frankly, I am glad you made your post. It is a great example of what many in the US believe, and I hope that the viewers from other nations will read it and understand fully why positions such as yours should be feared and hopefully they will take care that the infection of ignorance does not spread to their shores.
The point is that your post contained nothing but personal opinion and misrepresentations. It is at the heart of the issue being discussed here, a retreat from reality and shows a total misunderstanding of Science.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-08-2006 12:56 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-08-2006 10:08 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 81 of 132 (330318)
07-10-2006 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Hyroglyphx
07-10-2006 10:23 AM


More basic level misunderstandings
For more clarity, think of it this way. The 1930's version of ToE was a FACT, and anyone countering that was just a misinformed religious zealot. Now, in 2006, the FACT of 1930 evolution has itself 'evolved' to the point that its largely a brand new theory. Oh, but no... Now, for sure, 2006 ToE is a FACT. Do you understand what I'm saying?
We understand what you are saying, it is simply wrong.
The TOE has never been fact, and your first clue should be that it is called the Theory of Evolution. Of course it changes as more is learned. That is the nature of Science, Wisdom, Knowledge.
That Evolution happened is a FACT. The evidence for that is so overwhelming that using a term such as FACT can be justified.
The explanation of that FACT, the TOE has changed and hopefully will change as more is learned.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-10-2006 10:23 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024