OK ddg
What's non-scientific about showing that:
1. All known examples of observed evolution, including that on rapid generational entities such as viruses and bacteria, do not demonstrate anything other than allelic variaiton or loss of function.
2. Life today and the fossil record show very few transtional forms.
3. Genomes are showing us that gene families, as well as anatomies, are mosaically spread throughout life.
These are all consistent with a created origin of 'kinds' with evolutionary diversifcation within those kinds. The data puts severe constraints on both how evoltuion or creation occurred but proves or disproves neither of them.
There is absolutely nothing unscientific about the above except that you despise the connotations it carries. We actually love science as much as you do - we just want to pont out that there are multiple ways of interpreting the same observations.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 11-13-2002]