HELP!

dear Extremist,Tell them that evolution as we observe it is probably a guided process. Tell them that evolution as we see it may be not so directionless as claimed by neodarwinists, and tell them that it can be backed up by scientific publications. Any questions? Refer to my postings.Peter

dear E,Not so hasty.You say:
"excuse me what scientific evidence were you talking about????Evidence AGAINST evolution as a random process. The phenomena we observe (including your observations below) are usually explained by evolutionists as the result of millions of years of blind chance. However, about two month ago I posted scientific evidence against this random mechanism (and several other things that violate the hypothesis of evolution). What is explained as evolution may as well be a guided process. All things to carry out variation (and often mistaken for evolution) could be present in the genome and may be put there by a creator.The fact that there are NO transitional links and intermediate forms in either the fossil record or modern world, therefore, no evidence that evolution has occured in the past or present???"Exactly my point."Or wait maybe you were talking about the evidence that Natural selection is incapable of advancing an organism to a "higher-order". OR wiat i think it's this little tidbit of info....although evolutionist state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is an impossibility of SCIENCE and the natural world. I was mistaken...it's this evidence 9 of the 12 popularly supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/monkeys and not part human at all...the other three are FULLY human. Oops...my bad...need i go on>""Yes, evolution from microbe to man by blind chance is a fairytale."Best wishes
Peter

dear Mr Pamboli,Now we are back at the level of 'argumentum ad verecundiam'. Study all opinions and choose. Making a choise, that's what it is all about.
Best wishes,
Peter