No I'm just saying you should be more worried about the ideological content on the evolutionist side, rather than on the creationist side. As with eugenics, the ideology on the evolutionist side is much more menacing than anything creationism ever put forward, you should be very worried about it. The idea that things like the selfish gene theory, and associate evolutionary psychology, would somehow automatically be dissolved by a "self-correcting" science, misses the point that science so becomes a vehicle for evil, and science can hardly correct evil.
It would certainly be very useful to students, to learn about the creation of things from the point of view from where they are decided. A tremendous gain in knowledge. Intelligent design in it's principles presents much the value of the historical view, of unique decisions, in stead of the generalised view of evolutionists, of laws and forces. I don't see the attached ideology of reference to God as owner of that decision as very menacing. I believe you are contorting to see any real menace in it, while the menace is much apparent on the evolutionist side.
"In general the chinese are not as attractive as caucasians." This is something you might read in evolutionary psychology as an objective statement, although they also say that this fact may change according to changes in the conditions on which the fact is based. See my point about menace being on the evolutionist side?
regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu