Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution
John
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 56 (22599)
11-13-2002 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Lemming
11-13-2002 6:53 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Lemming:
o yea Gene i was stating the fact about the pyramids you failed to answer you just put the real facts in failed to answer the question and anyway its not about how and why they was built it was about the people who built them they had more knowledge than that of any later day Human "Correct" (Because we can't build them "Now")
Sorry Lemming but Pyramids are damn easy to build. You pile rocks on top of each other. I know there is a lot of mythology about the pyramids but there is nothing amazing about them except for the sheer brute force and time investments.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Lemming, posted 11-13-2002 6:53 PM Lemming has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 56 (22708)
11-14-2002 11:58 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Lemming
11-14-2002 11:55 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Lemming:
only 1 but more bones have been found of dinosaurs
Are saying we have only one ancestral human bone?
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Lemming, posted 11-14-2002 11:55 AM Lemming has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Lemming, posted 11-14-2002 12:05 PM John has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 56 (22713)
11-14-2002 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Lemming
11-14-2002 12:05 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Lemming:
no i didn't say we had 1 but so far i have only seen 1 mentioned...
quote:
only 1 but more bones have been found of dinosaurs
What does this mean then?
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Lemming, posted 11-14-2002 12:05 PM Lemming has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Lemming, posted 11-14-2002 12:17 PM John has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 56 (22727)
11-14-2002 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Lemming
11-14-2002 12:17 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Lemming:
k my turn to play dumb
I am beginning to wonder if you are playing.
quote:
i am saying only 1 has be found
One WHAT?
Karl, in post #22, brings up fossil hominids-- lucy in particular.
You reply in post #28:
quote:
only 1 but more bones have been found of dinosaurs
I ask, in post #29, for clarification.
quote:
Are saying we have only one ancestral human bone?
In post #31, you deny that this is what you meant. So what the hell did you mean? One fossil? One individual? One species? One what? It shouldn't be that hard to clarify your statement, unless, of course, you, like the rest of us, do not know what you are talking about.
quote:
and i will also say prove the one we found is related to us and not the modern day ape
Gee.... actually, both statements are true. What you want is evidence that Lucy-- assuming this is the cryptic 'one' you are brandishing-- is a direct ancestor.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Lemming, posted 11-14-2002 12:17 PM Lemming has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Lemming, posted 11-14-2002 4:19 PM John has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 56 (22839)
11-15-2002 8:14 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by Lemming
11-14-2002 4:19 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Lemming:
oops k lets see if you understand it more if i put what i said this way,
"ONLY!!" 1

LOL.....
Having read your other posts, I have realized that your facts are soooooo wrong as to put you in another galaxy. At first, I thought you had a point....
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Lemming, posted 11-14-2002 4:19 PM Lemming has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 56 (22854)
11-15-2002 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by nator
11-15-2002 10:47 AM


quote:
Originally posted by schrafinator:
Would you ever consider spouting off that "Relativity is a bunch of hogwash!"? No? Well, why do you think you can do that with regards to Biology?
Actually Schraf.... Have you been following the "Cookie Debate" ?
In particular, Post #48, though the whole thread is quite a read.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com
[This message has been edited by John, 11-15-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by nator, posted 11-15-2002 10:47 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by nator, posted 11-15-2002 11:12 PM John has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024