Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 53 (9179 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,133 Year: 5,390/9,624 Month: 415/323 Week: 55/204 Day: 31/24 Hour: 3/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Impossibility Of The Flood
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17850
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.7


Message 70 of 100 (561145)
05-19-2010 2:37 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Buzsaw
05-18-2010 11:36 PM


Re: Application Of Natural Events
quote:
We ID creationists must apply the same observed events, fossil record, historical record, etc to argue for our premises and theses that evolutionists apply to theirs, though our methodologies in application and interpretation may differ from theirs.
No, you don't. You ignore evidence that you don't like altogether. Some other evidence you reject by making up crazy excuses. Hell, you even make up implausible excuses to "explain" why your main supporting evidence doesn't support your claims and STILL expect to be taken seriously.
The best that you can say is that you make a feeble pretense at rationality. And then childishly whine about how unfair and biased your opponent are for looking at the real evidence, for rejecting your obvious fabrications, for catching you in your misrepresentations

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Buzsaw, posted 05-18-2010 11:36 PM Buzsaw has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17850
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.7


Message 72 of 100 (561147)
05-19-2010 2:39 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by subbie
05-19-2010 12:51 AM


Re: Application Of Natural Events
quote:
So, Germany was an agent of a loving, just god when it slaughtered 6 million jews.
While Buz sometimes manage to say decent things don't forget that he's the guy who twists Ezekiel 35 into a prophecy that GOd will massacre the Palestinian Arabs And then says that it should be counted as a fulfilled prophecy because he likes it so much. Can't get much sicker than that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by subbie, posted 05-19-2010 12:51 AM subbie has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17850
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.7


Message 82 of 100 (561213)
05-19-2010 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Buzsaw
05-19-2010 12:05 PM


Re: Application Of Natural Events
quote:
Says Mr. Blind Assertion.
Buz, while you love to (falsely) accuse others of making blind assertions the fact is that your claim that the flood would mess up dating really IS a blind assertion. And in fact you know that it is a blind assertion - because you never, ever offer any real support for it. That's what makes it blind. All you do is keep repeating it in the hope that maybe someone somewhere will believe it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Buzsaw, posted 05-19-2010 12:05 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024