Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Will you oppose to scientific conclusions if they'll lead to theology?
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 54 of 112 (187749)
02-23-2005 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Phat
02-23-2005 10:00 AM


Re: Logic
quote:
parsmnium writes:
If irrefutable evidence was found for the existence of God, then scientists would accept it.
Unless, upon further examination, original sin was proven to be part of the human condition. What I mean by this is that the premise of original sin includes the presupposition that humans are predisposed to refute
Given the number of inadequate arguments for the existence of God that have been made - and believed - I would say that it is pretty clear that there is no inherent tendency to refute such arguments.
This link leads to a free online version of a classic book on the subject of philosphical arguments for a God - J. L. Mackie's The Miracle of Theism Questia
This message has been edited by PaulK, 02-23-2005 10:24 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Phat, posted 02-23-2005 10:00 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024