Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution is a Religious Issue
Jordo86
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 303 (185086)
02-14-2005 10:45 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by nator
02-06-2005 9:49 AM


SCHRAFINATOR "If we walk into our house after a long day at work, and we see that the door lock was jimmied, all the jewelry and electronics are missing, can we conclude that we were burgled, even though we didn't see it? And, when the crime scene is processed, can we not gather evidence such as fingerprints, tire tracks, footprints, and other evidence left behind by the perpetrator that you would accept as inferred evidence of who did the crime, and perhaps other crimes, if they could be matched?"
I hate to be picky but both sides to this debate can use these types of arguments. I mean, a creationist could then say
"If we are walking along the street and come across a painting, car, building, fence ect ect can we conclude that someone made them even if we didnt see them do it?"
Thats all i wanted to say, i wasnt attacking you shrafinator its just that i dont think those arguments are valid because pretty much anyone can use them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by nator, posted 02-06-2005 9:49 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by NosyNed, posted 02-14-2005 1:45 PM Jordo86 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024