sog345, you have been presented with evidence, quite clearly and concisely, in post 34 of this topic. Yet you continue, in delightfully broken written English, to deny that you have ever seen any.
I doubt this will produce any positive effect, but perhaps you could tell us why the items in post 34 are not evidence. Just ranting that there is no evidence and refusing to address it went presented with it are the actions of a mindless zealot, and you aren't one of those, are you?