Evolution is a Religious Issue

You have been given several posts with specific evidence. You have been asked more than once what is wrong with this evidence.You will have to answer that or you will get a 24 hour suspension to think it over. Your ignorning what has been supplied and questions being asked of you is not debating in good faith.

This is a warning; not a suspension.He has time to look over what has been posted and think about what is unacceptable. If he continues to say that no evidence has been supplied he will be given 24 hours to think about it.He may honestly believe that it isn't good evidence but he needs to take each piece of evidence and point out what is wrong with it not simply say there has been none supplied.He also needs to explicitly respond to what others are asking. He has been asked to acknowledge that something as been supplied and to comment on it. He has avoided doing that. To continue to avoid it will result in a suspension.Whether there will be one more warning or not depends on the nature of his next posts.

You agreed to certain guidelines in order to register.These guidelines help make the discussions a bit easier to follow and help them flow in a non-chaotic fashion.It is impolite of you to think that you may be as disruptive as you please. If you presist in being impolite you will not be able to continue posting.

Since the point of this thread is whether something is a 'religion' or not it seems appropriate that you define how one would distinguish a religion from some other view point or way of considering the world.When you have clarified that then it is suggested that you support you claim that "evolution" (which you also seem to have a rather non-standard definition of) meets the criteria of your definition.Continuing to post as you have with the tone that you have used will result in a 24 hour suspension to start with. There will not be any more warnings.

Please tie this more closely to the topic title.If the next few posts don't do that then I'll give this thread a rest too.

That would take us rather far off topic. It is more appropriate in Dates and Dating which you seem to be avoiding.If you haven't seen a refutation of that it can only mean that you are not looking.

It would be appropriate for you to check that you are answering all of Schraf questions as it appears she is attempting to do with yours.If you continue to be unable to respond in good faith it may be time for you to leave the science based threads. How about we give you a couple more days to see how you do?

Not good enough. The DNA issue has, it appears to me, been made a part ot the topic. If you think it isn't then explain that and allow Schraf a rebuttal. You have somewhat more than 40 hours.