I would agree with this, theres tons of science that is produced by companies to show thier view is right and the other guy is wrong. remember all the stuff on colesteral and how bad eggs or bacon was?
like the other people have said when people use "bad" and "good" sometimes they just mean science is good because you can repeat the tests, if you can't do so it is bad science
i agree the scientists funded by the oil companies are making a bad ethical judgement, the judgment being money over objectively producing factual science
This message has been edited by ReverendDG, 05-08-2006 06:22 PM
™ Version 4.2
