Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bad science?
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 131 of 148 (340088)
08-14-2006 8:42 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Quetzal
05-15-2006 9:13 AM


"Bad'Scientists
Sorry, Q, I`m a late arrival to this thread
As long as you are willing to admit that the "bad science" is limited to a vanishingly small subset of all scientists, then we have no further disagreement.
While I realise there may not have been much choice in selection of employment, the use of approx 20,000 'scientists' in the Biopreparat program to develop incurable diseases might suggest that `bad' science is more widespread than you suggest. Of course, it`s more a question of morality than misuse of the scientific method, but the victims mightn`t see it that way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Quetzal, posted 05-15-2006 9:13 AM Quetzal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Quetzal, posted 08-14-2006 11:05 PM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024