Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Big Bang is NOT Scientific
generaljoe
Inactive Member


Message 149 of 301 (298486)
03-26-2006 11:56 PM


the big bang theory cannot be judged without holding some credentials in the given area of aeronaughtic or NASA equivalent engineering, but if you view fourier series in relation to a morphic thermal matrix equation (or for example parabolic partial differential equation) or even a thermal density matrix (http://militzer.gl.ciw.edu/diss/node13.html) you can see that a parabolic universe is not quite possible (with our knowledge of maths). Yet a quantitive approach, if not extremely large and complex, can yield a more accurate result through partial differentiation of heat through the friction of electrons and quasars, the result is that an initial atom, could in fact have manifested an exponential increase in energy when held in a vaccum of no other external forces, but the nuclear forces from the atom itself.

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by cavediver, posted 03-27-2006 4:01 AM generaljoe has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024