Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Big Bang is NOT Scientific
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4140 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 72 of 301 (297213)
03-22-2006 5:13 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Genghis Khan II
03-21-2006 9:29 PM


are we talking nuclear explosions? if we are, what do you make of the glass that is created from the blast? isn't that ordered?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Genghis Khan II, posted 03-21-2006 9:29 PM Genghis Khan II has not replied

ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4140 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 116 of 301 (297996)
03-25-2006 2:43 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by knitrofreak
03-25-2006 1:01 AM


Re: Creation and Evolution both start with nothing
Neather side starts from nothing, the basic life-forms came from something, but evolution doesn't deal with that, take that up with people developing the theories of abiogenesis
and the creationist side doesn't start from nothing, there was the primortal waters, which comes closer to where abiogenesis theorizes life started, in water
no law will ever state having something come from nothing, that doesn't make any sense, at least as far as life

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by knitrofreak, posted 03-25-2006 1:01 AM knitrofreak has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by knitrofreak, posted 03-26-2006 1:26 AM ReverendDG has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024