When you are challenged, it is suddenly off topic? Interesting. In any case, to proceed. Buz said:
Something had to be forever existing in order to produce anything. I say it was God. You might say it was a particle of space as Rich Gore of National Geographic put it, or whatever you think it began from.
That is quite incorrect. To begin, I said nothing of the sort. I questioned your assertion that complexity requires a creator and that the creator is some kind of god. That proposition is inherently illogical and can only be defended by a special pleading, which you, like clockwork engaged in with the first sentence I quoted when you claimed that everything has to be created except god.
It may be disengenuous to refer to creationists as ignorant for the reason you give but that wasn't what the originator of the thread said. The initial post was regarding the writer's observation that creationists tend to be relatively uninformed about the real science of evolution. I happen to agree with that.
Buz, if you object so strongly to the term "ignorant creationist" you might try not being an exemplar of it.