Is Hovind going to hell?

Joz, I do not know the detail context of this thread but if it is the same HOVIND I saw on TBN, who was debating with H. Ross, then there is not need for Hovind to apologize. He is quipped becasue out of teaching in high school, he realized that the students had questions he could not answer and it was not because he "had all the answers" but because the science was a little flippant itself. I could not even get any one to answer my high school question at Cornell how does one COUNT a collection of organisms. So imagine when it come to disscusion gentics applied to biological change and all manners of biometry are involved that it would have to be accepted (the account, I mean) apriori or on authority but people like Ross and I would imagine whom ever was talking with Hovid would do the same for a desgin argument used before all the requirements came in. This has been an error on both sides of the tissue. The issue against this man must be unfounded. I have reduced the whole creation evolution tissue issued to that of the whether or not cappilary action explains venom motion in lizards but not snakes. This is why contra to taxocomers discussion of creation/evolution some resolution of this possible hypothesis is possible but becasue the PARTICIPANTS span the universe of topics the resources beyond simply debating are not put to settlement as would have occured if this was a tortable offense. In my case, sadly it is. I do not want to make eventually a class action of it for now it appears I will have to be using theplead the 5th more than the power we all people, the place it but not the utility stopped.