Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 60 (9208 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,417 Year: 6,674/9,624 Month: 14/238 Week: 14/22 Day: 5/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing
Larni
Member (Idle past 102 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 21 of 154 (818466)
08-29-2017 5:00 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Porkncheese
08-27-2017 9:49 AM


Intelligent design is possible.
But that is no reason to suspect it actually happened.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Porkncheese, posted 08-27-2017 9:49 AM Porkncheese has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Pressie, posted 08-29-2017 5:14 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 102 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 30 of 154 (818481)
08-29-2017 12:03 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Pressie
08-29-2017 5:14 AM


Yeah.
All the things I can imagine and yet they never seem to become real.
I don't think it's fair.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Pressie, posted 08-29-2017 5:14 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 102 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 31 of 154 (818482)
08-29-2017 12:24 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Porkncheese
08-29-2017 5:53 AM


Why so angry, friend?
Seriously, if you've such a hair trigger then the big bad old world is going to come as a massive shock.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Porkncheese, posted 08-29-2017 5:53 AM Porkncheese has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 102 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 110 of 154 (818854)
09-03-2017 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Porkncheese
09-02-2017 4:59 PM


Re: WAS I NOT ABUSED???
Is this what a melt down looks like?
Edited by Larni, : Spellink

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Porkncheese, posted 09-02-2017 4:59 PM Porkncheese has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-03-2017 5:37 PM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024