Chariots of God (Scripture & Photo Examined)

I see the spirit of a tree...You can see the trunk near the center of the mass and moving downward with the branches and foliage making a much larger mass above the trunk. I mean, all you are playing here is what do you see in this object and any human will see something different because it is just something our brains do with any pattern, they try to resolve it to what we know.Do you notice that on every ghost show they seem unsure of what they saw or heard until one member states what they saw/heard and then everybody seems to be on the same page. "Oh yeah, It totally did sound like it said Zack!" The human mind reads into patterns for recognition, this is a known phenomenon. What evidence (outside of the pictures) do you have that this is not what is occurring for you? How can we verify that this is a spirit and not pareidolia caused by the human brain seeking recognition in patterns? Scriptures are not sufficient evidence since plenty of those also lack any sort of corroborating evidence. Explain how we could possibly test for this without receiving false positives due to dust, bugs, lighting effects or any other known flaws in photography.Edited by Tempe 12ft Chicken, : No reason given.

As you seemed to just gloss over the actual questions of evidence, let's ask you again: What tests have been done on the photo taking to verify authenticity? Have you tested other possible answers for the phenomenon? Have you gone to the same location and had someone that provides a dust cloud to try and generate similar images? I don't care about what you claim to know, I want to know what evidence you can provide outside of a picture of a blurry light, something which is known to be caused by many different possible malfunctions/reflections? What was the humidity in the air when the picture was taken? Could moisture have created some reflection? Please provide your evidence for your claim.Edited by Tempe 12ft Chicken, : No reason given.

And I have stated that a book written by man is not good enough evidence to guarantee that these camera pictures (that were taken thousands of years later with equipment they could have had no idea about) are anything more than pareidolia, an idea they also did not understand as well as we do. Therefore, I am asking you to go beyond the scriptures and provide further evidence for the accuracy of what you shot with your camera. Otherwise, I can tell you that I know that these pictures are perfect examples of well known faults in camera technology, faults that have been decreasing as the camera technology has advanced. So, now we appear to be at an impasse as we both know something. Here is the difference, I can provide evidence of how light, dust, and bugs can affect cameras and create identical images to the ones you are claiming to know are spirits. You need to provide evidence that these spirits are not something which we already have evidence of; i.e. - light, dust, bugs, etc...Edited by Tempe 12ft Chicken, : No reason given.

For reals! That is the thing you are going to claim is an alien? That is nothing more than a blurry image of a tree root buried in snow. In fact, the colors of the "alien" match identically to the colors of the branches that are on the left side of the picture, especially the one that is located about one third down from the top. That is a great example of pareidolia in effect though, so thanks for showing us again how great humans are at seeing people/aliens/spirits in random objects.