Chariots of God (Scripture & Photo Examined)

they're not dolls, though.and the girls, of course, claimed to have interacted with the faeries.

no doubt they are, but i was talking about UFOs (unidentified flying objects), not aliens. they are not the same thing, which is kind of the point. better cameras = fewer unidentifiable things in photographs. show me a recent one. why are they easier to get on shitty camera gear? this is the reverse of my professional experience, which tells me that better camera gear makes it easier for me to capture a wider variety of subjects. the one that looks like a fish?

How would you know? You won't admit the smallest possibility of it. Well there's your first problem. Only a Sith deals in absolutes. Watch out, a Jedi might be looking for you.

Thanks, that answers my question quite nicely. Then I suggest you get a password for your workstation, 'cause someone is posting nonsense using your handle.

You would not know the truth if it hung from your forehead.

Alien Body Discovered in Buryatia Russia April 2011 Professional Ghost Hunters use good equipment. It is not that photographs are easier to get on inexpensive equipment. It is that a lot more people own this equipment and have it on hand when they have the opportunityt to take the shot. Yes, although it looks a lot more human than fish. This is because it is human.

For reals! That is the thing you are going to claim is an alien? That is nothing more than a blurry image of a tree root buried in snow. In fact, the colors of the "alien" match identically to the colors of the branches that are on the left side of the picture, especially the one that is located about one third down from the top. That is a great example of pareidolia in effect though, so thanks for showing us again how great humans are at seeing people/aliens/spirits in random objects.

Your alien is a known hoax.This does not bode well for your dust pics.Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

Do they eat? Can the ones without faces communicate?

What you see and what you know are not necessarily the same thing.I have seen Fred Flintstone but I know he isn't real.

well, i asked for a UFO, not an alien. and, uh, that one's a well known hoax:

quote:

---

April 22, 2011 Update!

​

Rt.com (Russia Today) has reported that the dead alien found in Siberian Russia was nothing more than a hoax. The supposed alien corpse was two feet high and badly mutilated, found partially buried in the snow by two Russian men. Because the body was so humanoid in appearance, a news paper editor to whom the story had been submitted called the police, fearing that it was the body of an infant or a young child, instead of the body of an extra-terrestrial.

​

Upon being confronted by the police, who took the report seriously and began investigating, the men who found the dead alien admitted to it being fake. They said it was chicken skin that had been stuffed with bread and painted alien colours. The men were not charged with any sort of crime, as creating a hoax is not a crime, however they were apparently reprimanded for their actions, which caused a police investigation. Furthermore, the crash landing that some believed the alien body to have come from, are now said to be bombing testing that had been taking place at a near by Military testing range.

​

While there is proof positive that this particular incident is not, indeed, a real alien , one should not consider it proof negative of extra-terrestrial life.

​

Dead alien found in Siberia, 2011 — Update! | Latest UFO sightings

---

i mean, not that i've seen. they're re-purposing EMF scanners, and using consumer grade audio and video recorders at best. my camera is one of the three nearly identical ones in this picture (not the white lens): it's many pounds heavier, several times larger, and way more professional. this is the image i was shooting at the time (the full frame, no crop) that hill is almost exactly a mile away from the lincoln memorial (as the crow flies), and my lens is at 200, or just barely wider. i could look it up when i get home if you're really interested.the point is, if there was a giant alien spaceship a mile overhead, you bet your ass i could get a could get a clear picture of it. the thing is, photography gear is becoming more and more accessible for the amateurs. plenty of people have reasonable quality dSLRs these days, and even the camera-phones in everyone's pockets are quickly becoming very good. well, as good as they can be, considering. why are these ghost images always shot on potatoes?well, i see a barrel-eyed fish.

I could care less about the "alien" photograph. The vast majority of my experience and understanding is with spirits.Edited by ScottRP, : No reason given.

Spirits do not need to eat. I have seen two human spirits without faces and can vaguely remember one of them speaking. Other spirits without human faces communicate.Edited by ScottRP, : No reason given.

I know what I have seen.

deletedEdited by ScottRP, : No reason given.Edited by ScottRP, : No reason given.Edited by ScottRP, : No reason given.Edited by ScottRP, : No reason given.